Kansas City News Blog

I am one of Byron's 32 MySpace friends; I also correspond with him. He is not the heathen you are attempting to paint him as. Perhaps you ought to reference the dictionary for the definition of sociopath.

so·ci·o·path [soh-see-uh-path, soh-shee-]
–noun Psychiatry.

a person, as a psychopathic personality, whose behavior is antisocial and who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.

n. One who is affected with a personality disorder marked by antisocial behavior.

n. A person affected with an antisocial personality disorder.

Being in the grips of subculture during youth does not a sociopath make, nor does a presumed lack of bonding between an innocent incarcerated man and his prison mates.

Not only am I on Byron's friend list, but I am proud to be his friend in real life.

Byron Case is an amazingly talented, intelligent young man. He has certainly made a difference in my life. He has been a steadfast friend, he has encouraged me in my artistic endeavours, he has been more of a friend than I ever could have believed possible. He has done all of these things, and has asked for nothing in return but friendship. I feel very lucky to know him.

It is my honour and privilege to be his friend. He gave me a very special gift, and it would be impossible for me to ever repay him. He has a warm heart, and never fails to let that warmth show. In the time that I've known him, he has never failed to show his concern for my well-being. This is hardly the behaviour of a detached sociopath. To make the statements that Mr. Rugg made shows a lack of any real knowledge of Byron, or his personality.

It is deeply offensive when someone issues this sort of slam against a person that has no first-hand means of responding. Those of us that know Byron, however, do have the luxury of responding.

Mr. Rugg should feel deeply ashamed. Sadly, people like him seldom do.

Mr. (who are you anyways?? let me scroll back up to look... oh, uh, P. Rugg... nobody???) Rugg... I could only imagine that it is your own sociopathic tendencies that lead you to write articles such as this while acting like someone who actually cares. I'm an extreamly good friend of Byron's and know him very well. I am a proud friend of Byron's and DO trust him with MY life. Too bad your courage is so scarce that you are so afraid of a harmless young man, but we will see what we can do to get you some protection out here in this scary world if need be. If you were anyhting more than the third-rate "jounalist" that I hear that you are, you would probably be able to comprehend a story when you read one, meaning that Byron was not defending any murderers in his story at all. Notice the "my stomach turns" quote... He was defending the man against mindless GOSSIP when he was not around to defend himself and made a point that the man actually admitted to what he had done and there was no need to gossip behind his back like a little girl (like you are). So... here I am defending Byron against some mindless gossip as well. God, you remind me of some old, worn-out old woman... but I guess there are places for all typs of "writers" (or gossip columnists) out there. So you keep up the good work on what you do best: (my vocabulary fails me here... but "sucking" best describes it) sucking. Hope you enjoy all the attention your sociopathic ways have set you out to accomplish, babe. ~Jamie

Having read the first seven comments from friends of this true poet and convicted killer, Byron Case, I cannot help but wonder what kind of reaction the Pitch would have received from friends of Charlie Manson had it done a similar profile on his ennui while in prison.

These six people (one having written twice) are truly scary, speaking so caringly and lovingly about this convicted, cold-blooded killer as if he had taken a thorn from each one's paw. They all are proud to say they are friends of this guy. None of them knew his victim. None of them care about his victim, who was 18 when he took her life.

One of the posters wants us all to look at the web site specifically set up for this killer's defense, a site that contains partial truths and some outright whoppers.

Here is the other side of the coin: to learn the side of the victim, go to this site (http://www.stasia.org/case_against/index.html), and compare.

I knew Anastasia WitbolsFeugen when she was alive. I even knew Byron Case at that time, and I attended his trial, an advantage I have over most of the previous posters. If anything, Peter Rugg painted far too sympathetic a picture of this "man".

I think the comment posted May 22, 2007 7:10 AM shows a side of this issue that is not directly related to this article. This person, too cowardly to leave his name(as the "scary" supporters of Byron Case did), is confusing support for a wrongfully convicted man with approval for the crime that was committed. He has become wrapped up in his particular world view, and refuses to even consider the truth.

The comparison with Charles Manson is the sort of puerile nonsense that one generally expects to see from 5 year olds. Sadly, the First Amendment forces us to put up with kooks like this.

This "anonymous" person seems to think that attending the trial affords him some great insights into the character of Byron Case. This is wrong. Byron is an honourable, noble, caring, friendly, young man that fell victim to a corrupt state legal system.

Yes, I am PROUD to be Byron's friend. I believe in him, with no doubts or hesitations, 100%. I PROUDLY stand at his side, knowing that he is victim.

WWW.FREEBYRONCASE.COM

Absolute and unquestioning loyalty is characteristic of solid foundations in meaningful relationships; perhaps 'Frank' has never had one.

My belief in Byron's innocence was developed through reading every available court document, statement, and police report available, prior to any direct correspondence with him.

To "Frank:"

1. Where did you get your degree in Psychology? To accuse me of being some blindly loyal idiot, when you've never met me or spoken to me, must be the result of years of Psychological research.

2. Thanks for visiting my MySpace page! You mentioned that I lived in Pennsylvania, yet I never wrote that in the comments I posted. The only way you could have learned this fact is if you visited my page. Thanks for adding to my visitor count!

3. No one "spoon-feeds" me anything. I am aware of the facts of the case, and I find your arguments to be irrelevant, filled with supposition and innuendo, and based in fantasy.

4. Loyalty is not a failing. Perhaps you do not know this, but loyalty is the most important gift a person can give, or receive.

5. Where I live is immaterial. Harassment can occur by many means. When a person believes in something, he does not fear to leave his name.

6. And finally, "Frank," personal attacks against me do not frighten me, and will not dissuade me. I am resolute in my beliefs, and shall never abandon them. I do not retreat, no matter the reason. When a man must resort to this sort of attack, it proves how weak his case is.

WWW.FREEBYRONCASE.COM

Frank... you are an idiot. That's the entire problem. I've read the court transcripts... several times, and have seen every shred of "evidence" against Byron. He was railroaded... You even said it best. The prosecution KNEW what it needed for a conviction, and desperately NEEDED a conviction in this case since no one else was alive to prove otherwise. So they DID BUILD the case they needed and knew how to trip up any witnesses for Byron. Hell, prosecutors are TRAINED to be sociopaths. A person can SAY ANYTHING... even under oath... And that was done... now what I want you to do is show me another shred of evidence against Byron that is a visible fact and not just a statement out of a mouth... ...from Missouri by the way. ~Jamie

"you are an idiot. That's the entire problem."

Oh, so nice to hear "expert" opinion from another true believer, escpecially as to my intelligence. It has nothing to do with intelligence here, just perspective. You could have read a signed confession and you wouldn't have believed it. The evidence was compelling to a jury, and you still think it was bogus. Congratulations: you really are a True Believer.

I'm not going to argue the merits of Case's conviction here because (A) I wasn't on the jury and neither were you, (B) there really was a jury, approved by Case and his attorney, which found the prosecution testimony and evidence compelling and believable while disbeliving the defense, (C) the arguments are already well-presented at http://www.stasia.org/case_against/ and (D) the discussion here on this blog is not about the merits of the case (you have a web site that presents your "side"), but rather about how pathetic it is that so many otherwise intelligent people have been suckered into supporting a killer and to become losers themselves.

I'm not here to argue, I'm just here to laugh at the expense of all you whiny sychophants in the same manner that Byron Case used to laugh at Anastasia's family after the murder.

The jury made its call, I agree with their findings, and Judge Atwell made it clear that they had ample reason to do so with eyewitness testimony that matched the forensic evidence, and NO ALIBI. (see http://www.stasia.org/case_against/crimescene.html to see).

BTW, I didn't "say it best", I was just summarizing the claims from the BC website, which come down to nothing more than "we wuz railroaded". How many cons in prison will tell you they were "railroaded" because of evil prosecutors or cops, or because someone had it in for them? A substantial fraction, I'd guess. How many of them would you believe? That depends upon how many are as good-looking and as smooth-talking as Case.

There are over a dozen unsolved murder cases currently in Jackson County, Missouri at this moment, some of them many years old. There was no "desperation" here, except in Case's description. He knew he was a suspect from the day of the murder, and he now acts like this was such a shock.

"Hell, prosecutors are TRAINED to be sociopaths."

Now, THAT's an interesting theory. Why don't you suggest that Case use it in his next appeal? ALL prosecutors are evil, therefore all criminals are innocent. Shouldn't this be a line from "Sympathy for the Devil"?

"A person can SAY ANYTHING... even under oath... And that was done... "

You got that right. Byron Case lied his ass off in his efforts to save his ass. He'd lied so many times before that he thought it would work again this time. It didn't.

American Jurisprudence 1, Lying little shit, 0.

"now what I want you to do is show me another shred of evidence against Byron"

And now what I want you all to do is to go fuck yourselves. I've been reading and listening to Byron Case whine about how bad he had it since the week after Anastasia was murdered, because everybody was suspecting him, and Anastasia was such a good friend, and that we were all just being mean to him . . .

And now that he is a convicted murderer, he still whines, and now has a fucking Greek chorus behind him to help whine for him when he gets to tired.

Here is the bottom line: I don't got to show you no stinking evidence. The evidence was shown at trial, along with all his evidence and rebuttal, and he was fairly convicted. If you don't like the result, vote for a diffent god.

It is now HIS responsibility to try to overturn that conviction, and from what I heard from the family recently, his latest appeal won't go far.

I cannot actually speak for anyone in Anastasia's immediate family, but you've all provided me some entertainment today. Thanks.

Peter, I loved your story. Do it again some time. You're not making fun of the afflicted; you're making fun of the affliction instead.

WWW.CASECANGOFUCKHIMSELF.COM

Don, I know you are in denial about those emails you sent to Anastasia WitbolsFeugen's memorial website ( http://www.stasia.org ), so I had a copy sent me, and I'd like to share it with you (since you swear you never sent it, I'm not going to worry about privacy or copyright issues):

From: Don Buchwalter

Talk about slander!

Byron Case is the greatest man I've ever met. I have no doubt that his wrongful conviction will be overturned.

It is unfortunate that Anastasia was murdered, but it is tragic that the wrong man is paying the price for that murder.

From: Don Buchwalter
22 Mar 2007

A certain website, run by anti-Byron fanatics, claims that the supporters of Byron Case refuse to discuss the issue of a supposed "tacit admission." I will discuss it. For a person in the midst of a police investigation to refuse to discuss said investigation with a third party is perfectly normal. In fact, any defense attorney would instruct his client to remain silent unless representation was present. To say "We shouldn't talk about this." is not an admission, tacit or otherwise. It is what any intelligent person would say.

What the anti-Byron fanatics fail to mention is that the phone conversation was a set-up. The state of Missouri's "witness" was obviously and blatantly attempting to goad Byron into saying something incriminating. When he did not, the state merely redefined the meaning of incriminating. They were desperate to make a conviction, and they were willing to do whatever it took to convict.

When a case that steals the life of an incredible young man is based only on the lies of one witness, and the states blatant redefining of the 5th Amendment , we all lose.

Please visit www.freebyroncase.com to read the true story.

From: Don Buchwalter
07 Apr 2007

Your April 4th addition of a transcript of Byron's "tacit admission" proves nothing. A careful reading shows that he made_ no admission_, and that he was being goaded into making incriminating statements by a girl desperate to destroy him. It is sad that the Missouri courts had to throw out the law in order to convict an amazing man.

Any of this sound familiar? All three came with the same address, and with your name on them, and they sound like the same lunatic rantings from your MySpace site (really, everyone should go there and check it out. It's a hoot. We have a serious case of obsession here.) If it wasn't you, it was someone borrowing not only your email ID, but your writing "style".

And, oh yeah, we DID keep the original headers from the emails. They all came from you.

I saw you were already whining on your MySpace site about our earlier exchange, though you only posted your questions, and failed to post my answers, giving the impression that you were the last man standing.

And now you're whining about your email. Get a life, Don, get a life. MySpace is supposed to be a place to pick up chicks.

And BTW, Frank really is my name. I helped put the autobot together for the new website.

most of these posts aren't even about the article! The point is whether prisoners should have MySpace access. Mr. Case may get cable, but I don't think he has computer access! Lots of prisoners have myspace pages run by supporters, and there should be no reason that their friends can't do these pages.

i've read dons blogs, and those emails came from those blogs. anyone could have sent them.

Frank, I don't really know who you are or where you come from... both must be nothing, but would you please stop acting like you are so sure of yourself and that you have it all together. Your attempts to assure us all otherwise are only proof that you are a very insecure individual who is easily lead by others. You say that you are at peace with yourself and that this is all for your entertainment... but you've been obviously obsessing with the idea of Byron's guilt for over 10 years now... according to your own blog posts. I understand your need for justice in this case as well. I don't mean to be condecending in calling you an idiot either. That fact is not your fault, but since we are trying to educate you to the facts... it then becomes your fault, as it is elementary logic that you refuse to yield to. You may not post another blog immediately, but I know for a fact that you will read this. You know it too. A person like you is so predictable... blindly following and never thinking for yourself. I see that you could not provide another shred of evidence like I asked of you and I thank you for that... THANK YOU for proving my point... No... you "don't got to do nuthin'"... and you can't provide the shred that I asked for. Really, Thank you. We will notify you the day that Byron walks out a free man. That will be the day that you eat every letter of every idiotic word that came out of your childish mind. Again, I know it's not your fault that you can't think for yourself at this point, but I assure you that there will come a time that you will be held accountable for your own thoughts... if only to yourself. (So, there's no need for you to defend yourself here.) I'll also have you know that my opinion in Byron's case IS, in fact, "expert". Thank you for acknowledging that fact... I do know him and his situation inside out. Also... I never said that prosecutors are evil. Just sociopaths like yourself. Being a sociopath does not entirely MEAN that one is evil. Only sociopathic. It works for prosecutors... just not for common people. And I think it is very strange how you say that you cannot speak directly for anyone in Anastasia's family, having this "intimate" knowledge that you do... but you can speak for Byron, his guilt, and for all of us pathetic losers as well?? Frank... if you were Byron, we would all be your supporters. Simple as that. Whats right is right and whats wrong is wrong. Byron's conviction is wrong and based on nothing... and deep down you do know that. ...a misguided young woman's testimony that was obviously lead by prosecution. I know how many times her story changed even if she doesn't. So if I were you, I'd stop laughing... because if things go like this, you could find yourself in the same situation as Byron. We all could. Simple as THAT.

Frank will not post on this blog again, and this will be my only post. Frank was a 2nd cousin of Anastasia WitbolsFeugen's, just a couple of years younger than she would have been now, and had a major crush on her when they were mid-teens. I was her godfather, and yes, I met Byron Case before Anastasia's murder, and have communicated with him on more than a few occasions before his arrest. He probably doesn't much like me, but I doubt he likes anyone from Anastasia's family. No matter.

I apologize in advance for the length of this. If you thought Frank was long-winded, I can beat him easily.

The story that started all this was, as I read it, about the fact that a convicted killer has a MySpace page. Simple enough. Kind of bizarre, considering much of the content of the page, but not all that unusual when you think of it -- I'm sure there are dozens of cases of the same on MySpace.

Prisons, even maximum security ones, hold many prisoners who will eventually return to the real world. I don't have trouble with giving them cable and health care, as I'd rather they be happy to rejoin society than be totally cheesed off at the world when that time comes, and if lifers get some of the same privileges, so be it. Deal with it.

Do I care that Byron Case has a MySpace page? No. Not at all. Do I think it's appropriate what he puts on it? Does it matter whether I do or not? That was a rhetorical question; don't bother answering.

Do I believe, as apparently Frank does, that you're all pathetic fools? I don't know your ages, your backgrounds, your individual stories, so the answer to that would be on a case to case basis. I _do_ think you're wrong in your beliefs, but then you think I am, so we're even on that score.

Do I believe Byron Case is a sociopath? Again, do you care what I believe?

Since most of this discussion has been _way_ off the topic of the original blog, I will now continue that trend.

I've maintained Anastasia's memorial for nine years and still do, but I now have a little help on things from Frank.

I don't necessarily approve of Frank's bombast, but I have to agree with some of his sentiments, but with some of my own comments. He called me to let me know what was going on last night, and I asked him to stop posting any further.

I set up the memorial website the month after Anastasia's murder, and it predates Case's arrest and conviction by 3 1/2 years. I put up the information about Byron Case ONLY in response to what we consider unwarranted attacks and unprovable claims from his web site. There are two sides to every argumnet, and this is ours.

After the arrest of Byron Case, we started getting anonymous messages on the memorial guestbook demanding -- yes, demanding -- that we provide proof of why this "young man" is guilty. The messages increased to the level of spam after his conviction, and also grew in their vitriol. Nearly all were anonymous.

I've also received angry and argumentative emails from Aaron Vermeullen and Anna Hunsicker, who apparently object to there being a different view than theirs. Disagree if you like, but the First Amendment applies to me just as much as to them.

For quite awhile after the arrest and conviction, we had only news stories about it, but we kept getting our guestbook spammed by Case's family and friends. I got argumentative letters from Aaron Vermeulen, who made wilder and wilder claims and threats about what he was going to put on HIS website, and I put up our response ONLY in response to his claims. I later started receiving angry, argumentative emails from Anna Hunsicker, who objected to my web site, and who also doesn't much like me. I have to admit I am tired of such attacks, and when Don Buchwalter sent his emails, we made use of Frank's autobot to let him know that there's a new sheriff in town, and that the spam will stop. Mr. Buchwalter's response was to deny he made any contact -- we looked at the headers of the emails, and they came from him on three different days -- and attack us for our "attack" against him. I looked up his MySpace site today, but apparently it's closed to anyone who is not a "friend", which to me would be a self-defeating act, if you're trying to get the word out.

No matter whether you believe Byron Case got a raw deal or what, I want you all to understand that sending emails and leaving messages in a guestbook trying to argue with the family of a murder victim on behalf of her convicted killer goes beyond simply inappropriate. It's just wrong. You have your web site, we have ours. Say what you want on yours, we'll say what we want on ours. If you don't like it, tough, because that's what you'd say to us were roles reversed. Case's argument is with the courts, NOT with the victim's family.

Someone here claimed to actually be an "expert" in this. If that is true, why is that person not working on Byron Case's legal team? And why would an "expert" pronounce that "Prosecutors are trained to be sociopaths"?

That same person demanded that he or she be shown "one shred of evidence" to prove Case's guilt. Here's where I'm almost in agreement with Frank, that there are some real fools here. No one has to show YOU any evidence. It was shown to a jury, and the jury decided Case's guilt. Both the presiding judge and the Appeals court agreed that a verdict could have gone any way, but the jury made its choices on who it would believe and who it would not.

Tell me, are you the same person who was demanding proof from us way back before the trial?

If Byron Case's conviction were so obviously wrong as you all feel, why hasn't the Innocence Project jumped right on board? Why have Case's first appeals all been procedural? If this were such an obvious case, he'd have drawn some REAL support, not just a couple websites and this relative handful of supporters.

Those were questions for you to answer for yourselves. I've heard more than enough over the last six years from supporters of Byron Case who are all so sure of his innocence and that I'm going to hell for my sins; I will not check back here after this, because I'm really not any more interested in your opinion than you are in mine.

Let's all just be honest on that count, OK?

Anybody who understands the justice system knows innocent people are convicted every day
Fl. Supreme Court Justice
Gerald Kogen (Retired)
The Innocent Project has a backlog, waiting for Justice.

"The United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, admits that statistically 8% to 12% of all state prisoners are either actually or factually innocent."

To suggest, let alone claim, as Mr. Frank has done, that I have not wrestled with doubt is an insult to my intelligence. I have read the discovery and the trial transcript up and down, and in the past I was intimately familiar with many of the people involved in this case; I am not a blind follower of Byron. I have a baccalaureate degree in Political Science with a dual minor in Criminal Justice and History, I attended university on a full scholarship and graduated with honors, and I currently work as a 911 dispatcher and am applying to be a police officer. I have analyzed this case from the perspective of a friend, a student, and one who works in the Criminal Justice field, and to this day I still do not believe that my friend Byron killed my friend Stasia, and I also do not understand how the jury came to a guilty verdict. My father, who is a lieutenant and has over thirty-five years of experience on the police force, personally believes that Byron may have murdered Stasia, but does not understand how the jury ever found him guilty either, because he does not believe there was enough evidence to convict him. The fact is that, in general, I trust cops and I trust prosecutors, and I have faith in the Criminal Justice system. I believe that most people who are in jail are there because they are guilty, i.e. Mumia Abdul Jamal murdered Daniel Faulkner, and that those who are innocent shall avail themselves of the processes in place and achieve justice. This process is long and arduous, and what Byron needs most is the support of his friends and family. Contrary to The Pitch, Byron does not need another friend, but there is nothing wrong with courting open minds in the public and gaining additional support for his cause. This is the twenty-first century -- to not avail ourselves of every possible avenue for communication is insanity, even if it is the insidious teenybopper bandwagon that is MySpace.

I think Byron is actually lucky that his case is still making the papers. I may be too diplomatic here but just getting yourself out there might drum up support. So, Peter Rugg, whether misguided or right on the mark should be given his due for the publicity.

Patrick Rock wrote: Frank will not post on this blog again, and this will be my only post. Frank was a 2nd cousin of Anastasia WitbolsFeugen's, just a couple of years younger than she would have been now, and had a major crush on her when they were mid-teens.

Frank had a desire to be a “kissing cousin” with Anastasia, eh? Where I’m from, we'd call that incest.

There is a lot of valuable documentation at freebyroncase.com

Check it out! You'll be convinced!

http://groups.myspace.com/BYRONCASE

There IS an unvarnished truth!!!!!

I offered a couple of years ago to dismantle my entire “Case Against Case” web site in exchange for the Case web site (A) taking down all documents and statements attacking Anastasia or her family, or from her family but not involved in the trial itself, such as references to insurance policies in an effort to case aspersions on her father; (B) removing attacks on others that make claims having nothing to do with the legal case or which cannot be documented. Anna Hunsicker refused to deal with me in good faith. I was willing to converse with her if we could do it civilly, but she tossed out a few gratuitous insults while cutting off contact. I’d share them, but she specifically made it clear that I could not do that.

I said that she didn’t like me much. I may have understated that a bit.

As you can tell, she and I go to opposite poles. Where I go for understatement, she goes for overstatement. I’m going to have to correct a few things here.

Contrary to her belief, I do not consider myself arrogant, nasty, or a liar, nor do anyone else who knows me personally. Well, maybe a bit arrogant; but I AM a pretty good programmer. But I do think that Anna has shown a casual acquaintance with the truth in many points of this matter.

If Anna is no longer associated with the website, that’s a surprise, because her name is still listed as owner, and whether or not she still keeps it up, she is responsible for its current shape, so I address my comments to that fact, and to the fact that she had it in her power to compromise but chose not to.

I take some umbrage at her angry claim as to my misspelling her name. Of course I misspelled it, and of course I did so deliberately. And of course she knows exactly why I did so. My name is Patrick, not “Pat”, and I have used my full name since before she was a zygote. She knew this, as she addressed most of her emails to me correctly, but kept referring to me as “Pat” on her website. I spelled her name “Ann” to get her attention. When she angrily wrote “Anna, NOT Ann”, I replied that I knew that already, but then she knew she was making a subtle insult at me. I’ll say now what I said then: Glass Houses. You cannot assume the moral high ground when you've already take the first shot. It’s just Kettle-Pot name-calling. If she’s going to demand professionalism and civility, she should have shown it first herself.

Was I being the “upmost” professional with Anna? Well, I’m never “professional” unless we’re talking about Java or C#. I’m a programmer, NOT a professional correspondent. I will say that I showed Anna a lot more civility than she has ever shown me. The truth is that I believe that she expected incivility from me, and saw it in everything I wrote, whether true or not, and responded in that attitude.

It also shows that she hasn’t looked at my web site close to a year now. If there’s a misspelling there, it is purely accidental. However, my name continues to be spelled incorrectly on her site.

Anna listed her entire CV in her first post, and says she analyzed this case carefully, but what she didn’t say is that her mind was made up long before that analysis began. It was made up before Byron Case was even charged with murder.

As for “attempting to defame” her character, I will point out that the attacks from the Case website against Anastasia and her family (which include me) were there BEFORE I put up my website. All I have put up about Ms. Hunsicker is as follows:

(A)that she authored the website; while Aaron Vermeullen put up some of the worst attacks himself when he first set up the site, Anna lateer claimed sole responsibility for the site and made changes herself, so I believe that I can safely call her the author, and at the point where I do, it is in reference to something that she did indeed write herself;

(B) that she did not attend the trial at all, which is an important point when noting the “points of contention”, that the two people who are most responsible for the website put up those “points” without having attended and having not yet read the transcript; I was making the point that these “points” were formulated without a careful review of the trial, yet they still stick to them as if they were handed down on stone tablets;

(C) that her claims of Kelly Moffett’s “heavy drug use” are baseless, as in being nothing but a case of he said/she said; to this date, she has yet to show the slightest proof of her claims, except her own word;

(D) that Anastasia said it was Anna who made an effort to reunite her and Case after a major split between the two; Anna says she doesn’t remember doing so, but I made it clear that it was what Anastasia had told ME. As far as me saying she was not Anastasia’s friend, I base that on two things. First, how many Anastasia’s friends stood with Byron Case? Anna and Tara McDowell, who were both more Byron Case’s friends than Anastasia’s. They took sides. I think she forfeited the right to call Anastasia a friend, especially after the attacks on Anastasia from the website.

Second, I used Anastasia’s diary for reference. Anastasia thought Anna insincere and a “drama queen”, and never forgave her for (in her words) “ruining” her plans to move out of her parents’ house before graduation.

I said those few things about Anna to make it clear that the people authoring the website were not experts in any manner, and were making most of their claims without any basis in fact, only belief. Despite Anna’s declaiming how she has carefully analyzed this case, most of what was put up there went up BEFORE she made any analysis.

As for that diary, Anastasia was brutally open and honest with it, never expecting anyone else to read it. She kept observations about those around her, secrets they had shared, drug buys that she knew being made, drugs her friends were abusing, who was screwing whom behind whose back, name it. Anna, if I had wanted to attack you, there were a couple of juicy pages from that diary that could have been used, and you couldn’t have done anything about it after the documents full of speculation that you have up. I chose not to because there was nothing to gain from it. I could have attacked Byron Case’s mother and father, just with what he put on one of his own websites before his arrest, and his remarks about them that Anastasia recorded in her diary. I did not, because there was nothing to gain by it.

I did not testify at trial, nor did either of Anastasia’s parents. The insurance policies taken out on Anastasia and her sisters are irrelevant to the case. Anastasia’s drug use was, which was influenced heavily by her relationship with Justin Bruton, was likewise irrelevant to Byron Case's legal case. They were all put up for a single purpose, to potentially embarrass or defame people who were not involved with the trial. Regardless of who chose what content to use on the web site, they are up there now by Anna’s power, and with no pertinent reason but to hurt others. You reap what you sow, and in this case, I would still owe you a few more hits.

I listed information about Case for the same reason an opposing attorney might: to impeach his character. His character IS a major consideration in the issue, and he’s no longer the defendant, but has been convicted. Before the murder, he had already been convicted of felony burglary. He was by his own admission a heavy cocaine user. At 18, he picked up a girlfriend who was four years underage and helped her run away and hide from her parents. Most of Anastasia’s friends in high school -- and I got this information directly from them long before Case's arrest -- considered him a creep because of his lying and backstabbing. This could not have been stated during trial, but that time is past. He’s been found guilty. Is this gratuitous? If I were doing it just to make fun of someone, yes. But Byron Case is a convicted killer, and there are people who want us to believe he is a misunderstood boy next door.

While she makes the claim that I put up “unfactual” items without proof, I sent her copies of Evelyn Case’s spamming of the website. She read the messages, and she can recognize the style, which was identical to the notes that Ms. Case left on the Case website, except they weren’t so angry. She keeps insisting that I blame her for every instance in which one or more of Byron Case’s supporters did something or attacked us, and says I’m being mean. She’s just being thin-skinned and obtuse. She says she asked me for proof; she never asked me anything except rhetorical questions, as in “have you no shame?” I have the emails also.

As a point of fact, Anna herself printed a speculation from Byron Case accusing Anastasia’s father of the crime, which could have left her open for a libel suit. She took it down quickly, but the fact she put such stuff up should give one pause about how carefully she considered anything, and how much right she has to be angry at anyone else.

I noticed that most of the other posters have now gone to using pseudonyms or just hiding in anonymity. One apparently doesn’t understand the distance between second cousins, or maybe doesn’t understand what constitutes “incest”. In any case, you again lose the moral high ground to complain about Frank’s tirades and then make gratuitous insults yourself. I think most of the anonymous writers are probably only one or two different people just trying to inflate their numbers. I’m guessing that Aaron Vermeullen may have made an appearance on one or two.

...I seem to remember reading in the transcript (for one source) about how the forensic investigator (who was an intern filling in while the "main man" was away on vacation) was unable to even make a speculation as to what type of gun was used... so there was no official opinion: no official forensic evidence: no evidence... (except the "railroaded" (focused) confession made by Kelly after she'd made staments on three seperate occasions that three different guns were used... then chose to stick with the one she was told to !!BY WHOM!!?). And now it is impossible to go back and have a professional forensics investigator find out for sure, isn't it?
I guess it doesn't matter though that Kelly's convicting statement was under oath, and the other conflicting statements weren't.
Seems to leave just a little itsy-bitsy piece of a reasonable doubt... which a jury is supposed to be convinced beyond.

http://groups.myspace.com/BYRONCASE

"Before the murder, he had already been convicted of felony burglary. He was by his own admission a heavy cocaine user. At 18, he picked up a girlfriend who was four years underage and helped her run away and hide from her parents. Most of Anastasia’s friends in high school -- and I got this information directly from them long before Case's arrest -- considered him a creep because of his lying and backstabbing. This could not have been stated during trial"

You make a big deal of this, here and on your site. It's meaningless. If this was proof of murder, there'd hardly be any free people left.
"Alert the cops! He's a creep!"

Thank God for small favors!!

Patrick Rock said: “I respect your opinion, Curt, but again, you weren't at the trial, and reading parts of the transcript and a few cherry-picked documents is not the same thing as witnessing the testimony and personally viewing the evidence, as the jury did.”

I could not disagree with you more. I dare say anyone who wants to study this case at this point probably has better access to information than the jury seems to have been allowed to actually hear. And in my opinion, being at the trial means little as far as the historical court record, police reports and established facts of the case are concerned. Anyone can render an opinion based solely on those documents alone.

I must say at this point that I truly believe that both Anastasia’s and Byron’s websites have only limited amounts of usable information that is not skewed toward refuting accusations and counter-accusations leveled by one side of this dispute against the other. As such, both sides can be accused of “cherry picking” information to present to the public.

As such, I limited my reading primarily to the actual court documents and police reports because at least those appear to be less biased.

It is understandable that you have such strong feelings about this case given the amount of emotions you have invested in it. But in all honesty I must say to you that it is my opinion that because you are so emotionally involved in this, it colors your objectivity to a large degree. That fact alone would have disqualified you or any other family member from sitting on the jury.

As an independent “third party,” I feel that unlike someone with an emotional investment in the case, I can be put aside my subjective interpretations when reading the evidence, something that it always required of a good juror.

Thanks,

Curt Rowlett,
Seattle, Washington

The Two Wolves
“Words of Wisdom”

An elder Cherokee Native American was teaching his grandchildren about life.

He said to them, “A fight is going on inside me...it is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves.

One wolf represents fear, anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego.

The other stands for joy, peace, love, hope, sharing, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, friendship, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith.

This same fight is going on inside you, and inside every other person, too.”

They thought about it for a minute and then one child asked his grandfather, “Which wolf will win?”

The old Cherokee simply replied..... “The one you feed.”

...those are the types of questions that need some answers... man, thanks aaron! love to see somebody step up and say something about the above post except, "it's irrelevant".

All of that is fine. Except he admitted on the phone that he did it.

1. Byron DID NOT make a confession. 2. To use that recording as evidence is a violation of the spirit of the Miranda Warning, and is thus a violation of the Fifth Amendment.

Kelly Moffett was acting as an agent of the police department. If the police can do an end-run around Miranda by using civilians as their interrogators, why even have Miranda?

The police department had no evidence against Byron, only the word of a self-proclaimed drug-addict. Despite the fact that certain people would have us believe that Kelly Moffett was a credible witness, the police obviously did not think so, or this recorded conversation never would have taken place. They knew, as we do, that a bus could have been driven through the holes in her story.

So let's tell it like it is: The police are pressured to bring in suspects. The courts are geared towards convictions, despite the claims of innocent until proven guilty. The law is incredibly complex, and jurors are driven more by the show that is put on by the prosecutor, than by knowledge. Judges, supposedly impartial, often give preference to prosecutors. Court appointed "defense" attorneys are often inexperienced and over-worked, and are rarely vested enough in any one case to care about it.

Is this justice?

None of this matters now. His myspace page was deleted.

I find it very convenient that Byron's profile was suddenly deleted. Did someone make false complaints, by chance?

Another excerpt from Betsy Owen's (Anastasia's Mother)statement to police taken on 11-7-97.....

Thanks Betsy! How come you didn't testify at trial again?

"
Q. Would you be shocked or surprised if Bob had been abusing his children?

A. I'd be disappointed if the kids didn't tell me about it. The kids have been fairly well educated in school that this is something...

Q. But would it surprise you or shock you if he was? Just based on what you've told me today?

A. I don't know. Surprised, no.
Shocked, maybe yeah. Because that's you know, a higher degree of emotion. Part of me wonders well where was he when he was out looking for Anastasia, you know, what went on. But, you know, if she had been beaten to death I might have thought you know he might have had something to do with it"

Please read more at http://www.freebyroncase.com

PS. Byron's latest appeal will be posted soon. Thanks again for everyone's response. You to Patrick. Thanks for your two cents.

Have a great weekend everyone! AV out

Yes. Byron's Myspace page was removed from the web site. Whoever had a hand in having it removed... that is fine. Yes... I am the person who ran it for Byron. I may try to set up another one. I'll build a new stand alone site on my own for him... shit, I'll buy a server if I have to at this point. No matter how long it takes... Byron will be free. Count on it. You can't silence the truth. It is impossible. It stands on it's own and needs none of our feeble opinions... no matter who we are.

Revenge will get you nowhere.
But bad Karma is gonna get ya.
peace out.

We feel so sad, what Betsy Owens had to go through, the abuse and what her children where exposed to. Where was the LAW then?
Pat Rock said: She recanted! To WHO? The police? Proof it. PLEASE, Abused women have no selfesteem because evil men took it from them.

I SAID... YOU CANNOT SILENCE THE TRUTH... SHUT IT DOWN AGAIN IF YOU WANT... WE'LL BE HERE FOR HIM NO MATTER WHAT! SO MY COMPUTER WAS ZAPPED TOO... IT ONLY TOOK ME A FEW HOURS TO GET IT OK AGAIN...

I am hearing both sides here. I think this article was missing some things and some people who needed to be spoke with before it was written were not. I am an attorney who has read everything including the transcripts for this case. I am working on his appeal--one of many anyway. If anyone wants to speak with my office or wants to help get him out please let me know by sending me an e-mail or contacting me at juliej99@hotmail.com

June 11th
Byron was taken from us
Wrongful conviction is
kidnapping and torture

This can happen to anyone!

Let's try that again with the proper html:

The latest appeal is also available on Byron’s website.

That last comment was for Marty Thompson AZ

Hey guys you have to check out this guy's website. Check out his my space page as well. His name is Michael Perry and he's on death row in Texas. This is what I would like Byron's site to incorporate. Also might add a link from Byron's link menu. Check it out and see what you think. Evelyn, you'll need to see the video on dude's myspace page on a blazing computer. :( Take care.

AV out!

Michael Perry's Website
http://www.savemichaelperry.info/default.asp

His Myspace page
http://www.myspace.com/mp999444

His Petition Site
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/632291111

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/

http://www.freebyroncase.com

(my friend, Byron Case's website currently serving a life sentence without parole, in Cameron, Missouri for a murder he did not commit)

George Bargas
(My wife's brother currently serving two live sentences for a crime he did not commit) also in Texas.

The so-called "Texas Judicial System"

"George Bush said he'd do for America what he did for Texas!"

"Mission accomplished Mr. President!...

Mission Accomplished!" :0

Sincerely, Aaron Charles Vermeulen

...what??? is this discussion over??? i think it's far from over, huh?

Godfather or uncle? What's it gonna be Patrick Rock? You are/were not even family to Anastasia. Master of discuise.

Justice was not served, Anastasia deserves justice. An innocent man is paying the price for a horrible monster's crime and it's just not right.

Exactly, but it so scary that her last testimony was even "credible". If she got away with lying on the stand (so far) how many more times do you think this scenario has happened in court? It sad to think that a hateful person/liar could get an innocent man convicted. How do we bring JUSTICE back in today's society? I believe in karma as much as I believe in Byron's innocence. Kelly will have her day.

Exactly!

"Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much."

Ok, Don, that's enough. Grow up, get a life, select a personality and stick with it.

The term pedophile is used to denote an adult who is sexually attracted to adolescents or youths below the local age of consent. Byron Case obviously has no regard for the law, as statutory rape is a crime whether the victim wants the contact or not. An underage person is legally incapable of giving consent. Those that say Kelly "wanted" it, are simply trying to excuse another of Byron's crimes.

I think Kelly is a victim. Byron was an adult. What kind of man sleeps with a 14 year old? A sick man. Of course, since Byron is also a cold blooded murderer, it is hardly a leap that he would break the law in other ways. You put underage in quotes. 14 is, in every state, underage.

Byron Case is NOT an innocent man. A jury, and two appeals, found that Kelly was telling the truth.

Byron Case will rot in prison. He deserves to. The sad thing is that he was not given the death penlty.

The supporters of Byron Case are so deluded that they will believe anything he says. Anyone that gets involved with him does so at their own risk

Can anyone say: "Ted Bundy?", or "Charles Manson?"

Byron Case is a killer, pure and simple.

Vote for Robert WitbolsFeugen for Senator!

Yea, we definitely need a wife beating, child molesting murder in office. Like we need another cheating crooked son of a bitch in political office! Ouch! AV :0

Hey, Patrick Rock, stop posting under false aliases! Ouch again!

read more at http://freebyroncase.com/documents/betsyowens/betsy_owens.pdf

To be an “activist” for something to which you are vehemently opposed is the mark of a deprived individual. Filling your free time with a repugnant campaign against a man already incarcerated, and who by your own words “will never be free,” is demonstrative of a hollow in your own life. Willfully choosing to invest time in endeavors saturated in negative sentiment will be to your own detriment. Your crusade isn’t going to elicit the desired affect.

I think that the poster posing as "Sylvia" is either another sylvia or an expression of people against Byron, who are COWARDS and can't post by there own name.... Byron case is INNOCENT and the truth will come out. I agree with - To the misguided anti-Byron fanatic(s) , Byron case is INNOCENT!!! There is a REAL killer out there and that's what you guys should be worried about, not an innocent man behind behind bars, but a real killer.... Out there who may have very well claimed another victim.

Mania123 appeared to be posting in Byron's defense. It would seem that someone here is confused... Heh.

The truth is already known: Byron Case is a murderer. Obviously the deluded followers of Case have empty lives themselves. Why do you keep checking back? Also, the crusade does not have to elicit anything. Case is already in prison, and will never set foot in the free world again. I'm only here to spread the truth. For instance, if Byron Case is so honest and trustworthy, why does he have a fraudulent pen-pal ad up? He's nothing but a murdering liar.

Wagering a smear-campaign against a man already incarcerated is a waste of time and energy. Don't you have any friends, or a family of your own to concern yourself with? I check back here because I am a friend of Byron's. By your own logic, we're all helpless victims of Byron Case, anyway, so shouldn't you be pitying us instead of attacking us? The contradictions run deep in your arguments, and your insults are growing stale.

If that was your real photograph on your last MySpace page, I've seen a product advertised on television that might be able to help you with your unfortunate complexion. I'd be a social leper if my skin looked like that, too.

Get a life, a hobby, or just get out of the house every one in a while. This same old song-and-dance is tired.

WOW! He sure loves to correct small words huh? Must make him feel smart. I think that he is just jealous that Byron has the love and support he lacks in his life. I mean come on guys he only has 2 myspace friends. I did see the picture up on the myspace page he has and I must say he does look like the cousin lover type (which as you may remember it was mentioned he had a crush on Anastasia). To the cousin lover I think you should avoid this site until you have something meaningful to say.

Excerpt from Robert WitbolsFeugen's statement to police investigator on 10-23-1997.

Q. What time did you get home last night?

A. I got home about quarter till nine (2045) … eight-thirty (8:30) , quarter till nine.

Q. Was your wife home then?

A. Yes.

Q. Did she talk to you about anything unusual that might have occurred?

A. Well, before I left work last night around six (6) o’clock, I called my wife to let her know that I would be later than normal because I was going to a meeting. Just wondering how everything was. Oh..earlier in the afternoon I’d spoken with her and she said that my oldest daughter Anastasia (victim) , that she had to drop her off at the Mt. Moriah cemetery.

Q. And what time was that sir?

A. About four-thirty (1630) .

*NOTE*

On the police report filed by Epperson, on 10-24-1997, Robert WitbolsFeugen clearily states:

"Mr. WitbolsFeugen then began advising the following information: At 2330 hrs, 10-22-97, he was looking for Anastasia when he stopped at the gate of Mount Washington Cemetery (where he had dropped her off at 1630 hrs, this date, with her friends)."

Please read the full report here!
http://freebyroncase.com/documents/robertwitbolsfeugen/reports/epperson_report.pdf

These statements are just one day apart!
And these pigs can't catch a lie?

Robert WitbolsFeugen...
What a fucking liar! AV

Touché!

Frank, you are the fool and you should pity yourself. You think Byron is a murderer and that is your opinion but your sure do seem obsessed with him and with what's going on in his life, I can only wonder WHY? He is serving life in prison how is what he does any concern of yours? He currently belongs to the state of Missouri, so why are you poking around at his personal business? Are you that interested in him, or are you a sick pathetic creep who thinks he is a big man for causing trouble to a man who cannot defend himself? You are by far a poor pathetic reject. You need to read your facts, I think you need to reread some of the info posted above your comment there is also a link that has DOCUMENTS for you to view. Do your homework.

I was a good friend of both Anastasia and Byron, not to mention Justin. I do not believe Byron killed her. I do believe more attention should have been paid to Justin's role while in court, instead of this theory of a madman killer running amok. The simple fact is he was emotionally and mentally disturbed, to the point where to this day I feel guilty for not trying to get him some help. I miss Ana still, as I miss Justin, and Byron. We did not lose one promising and very cared for friend all that time ago, we lost three. I think we have lost sight of that.
I think free speech is just that- AND SHOULD BE EXTENDED TO ALL, not just those we agree with.

Won @ what? What exactly did u win?

I've proven my point that yes you are in fact OBSESSED with Byron. Your life must really suck. It is a tragedy that Anastasia and lost her life at such a young age and I hope you get help in dealing with her loss cause you obviously need it. You have become obsessed with Byron and you really need to get help to move on. All other viewers please visit FREEBYRONCASE.COM. Form your own opinion but get the facts first.

but your obsession runs deep for what reason again?

"The mob requires reg. doses of scandal,paranoia and delemma to alleviate the boredom of a meaningless existance. What begins as a seedling of reality germinates into a full-blown myth, which in turn picks up constituents along the way who confer substances to it".

Anton LeVey very appropriate Don.

Extra punishment??????????? Byron Case is serving a LIFE SENTENCE, you pathetic fool. It would take a lonely, desperate idiot with no life to find humor in this. Byron Case was wrongfully convicted of murder and his life was taken away there is nothing funny about that. You are entitled to your opinion so keep displaying your jokes and obvious obsession, but just know that it won't make a difference in the # of supporters Byron has. To get some truth to all this please Visit FREEBYRONCASE.COM

Cyberstalkers target victims using search engines, online forums, bulletin and discussion boards, chat rooms, and more recently, through online communities such as MySpace, Facebook, Friendster and Indymedia, a media outlet known for self-publishing. They may engage in live chat harassment or flaming or they may send electronic viruses and unsolicited e-mails. Victims of cyberstalkers may not even know that they are being stalked. Cyberstalkers may research individuals to feed obsessions and curiosities that they possess. Conversely, the acts of cyberstalkers may become more intense, such as repeatedly instant messaging their targets. More commonly they will post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact. In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory or pornographic content.

Psychopathic Personality Stalker:
Generally male
Absence of mental disorder
Targets familiar victims
Harassment may be anonymous
Usually some precipitating stressor

Love Obsessional: Most likely involving no prior relationship. The victims may become known through the media, or perhaps through the Internet. Love obsessional stalkers comprise the second largest group of approximately 43% (Geberth, 1992). A large number of these individuals may be suffering from a mental disorder such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The most common type is the individual who pursues a celebrity, which may be more familiar as the "obsessed fan syndrome".

"Though those that are betrayed Do feel the treason sharply, yet the traitor Stands in worse case of woe."

Number of Entries: 12
Entry Page Time: December 5th 2007 10:08:49 AM
Visit Length: 9 hours 48 mins 31 secs
Browser MSIE 7.0
OS Windows Vista
Resolution 1280x1024
Location: Erie Pennsylvania United States
Hostname: pool-71-116-29-143.eriepa.dsl-w.verizon.net (71.116.29.143)
Entry Page: www.freebyroncase.com/
Exit Page: www.freebyroncase.com/
Referring URL: No referring link

Don Buchwalter spent 9 hours, 43 minutes, 31 seconds on freebyroncase.com yesterday. Who's really leading the long, lonely existence?

WOW I guess that really shut the page up, Don you need to get a life. 9 hours, man what where you doing? I know there is alot good info on FREEBYRONCASE.COM but really, do you not have a job or a buddy to spend your time with?????

I doubt you are an HONEST citizen, You are an opinionated citizen same as the rest of us. You asked who is the vicious criminal? The answer is the state of Missouri for stealing Byron Case's freedom. You bring up his past as if you are some sort of saint. I doubt anyone on this blog can say they have not done things they regret today. Especially when they where young or younger. No one has said Byron was a saint, however, many believe in he is not Anastasia's murderer. Everyone has a past so any one using Byron's past as a logical reason for him to be 100% guilty is fully of SH*T! Take a look in the mirror what were you doing as a youngster? Have you ever experimented with illegal drugs????? In other words I sick of hearing these stereotypic idiots pointing their finger. My opinion is Byron Case is not a murderer. My opinion may not be the same as yours so if you do think Byron is really guilty give me some more reasons to back that up besides the same old song about him being a troubled young adult. Visit FREEBYRONCASE.COM to see what backs my opinion!

lets see if the code works this time

Missouri DOC Bans Inmates from Seeking Pen-pals on the Web

he Fight to Free Byron Case Manifesto

INTRODUCTION

Byron Case was wrongfully convicted of murder in 2002.
He had no motive. There was no DNA evidence. No weapon was ever recovered. During his trial, the type of weapon was not conclusively established. In short, there is no conclusive evidence which links him to this crime. Byron was arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced, based upon the thrice changed testimony of one alleged "witness." Byron's only "crime" was that he knew the victim.

1. Byron Case is an innocent man. The penal system of this country was built to punish the guilty. Every innocent man that languishes in prison diminishes us all. To help Byron is a step towards helping all the imprisoned innocent.

2. Byron Case is a victim. Political pressure led to his arrest. His trial was a sham, built on supposition and innuendo. Pieces of evidence regarding the veracity of the statement made by the state's one "witness" were not made available to jurors. The big three questions were never answered: "Did the suspect have the means to commit the crime? Did he have something to gain? Did he have the opportunity to carry out the crime?"(I defy anyone to provide definitive answers to ANY of these questions) Is this how an impartial justice system operates?

3. Byron Case is a good man. Based on a number of factors(overwhelmed police, inept defense, the prosecutorial "win-at-all-costs" attitude, and a lying witness(that had been given immunity), Byron was convicted. His life was taken from him. He deserves so much more.

CONCLUSION
My primary purpose is to spread the word about Byron Case and his unjust imprisonment. My secondary purpose is to help keep Byron as comfortable as possible until the day comes when he is released. My tertiary purpose is to help shed light on the very real problem of wrongfully convicted and imprisoned citizens.

In short: Anything for Byron.

Yes, I said those things. I was not sure of his innocence from the beginning, but was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt because of the things he said.

His mother sent me gifts, and he claimed that he had certain feelings that were later proven to be untrue.

I still have his letters, that state he had certain feelings, as well as his mother's e-mails. I have Evelyn Case, on tape. She made complaints to the police that a certain person is a pedophile). Byron himself made several comments abou friends of his who were willing to break the law on his behalf(Pablo, who stated that he was willing to spray-paint free byron case on public buildings).

Byron has stated that he was so influenced by drugs, that he was unable to remember the events of previous days. Does this make you feel good about supporting him?

Yes, I did write those words. I wrote them, however, before I had access to the actual trial transcripts.

Byron Case is a murderer. He will die in prison. His filthy slut girlfriend will never know a real relationship with him. His mother will will never see him free. Byron has no idea what he did when he got involved with a stupid, filthy, whore.

Don Buchwalter is jealous, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah nah!

Don Buchwalter is a stalker, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah nah!

Don Buchwalter is an asshole, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah nah!

Don Buchwalter stinks like a monkey, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah nah!

Don Buchwalter can't get over it, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah nah!

Don Buchwalter is lonely, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah nah!

Don Buchwalter is angry, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah nah!

Fuck you Don Buchwalter, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah nah!

It appears as though Don Buchwalter is looking for a virtual soapbox, since he wanders around in the real world unnoticed.

Get a life. Seriously.

That's life - people get their hearts broken. Put on your big boy pants and move on.

There once was a varmint named Don
Whom the maggots of decay did spawn
To spew forth his bile
With nary a smile
But with plenty of childish élan

Don shut the hell up! You are only pissed cuz Byron doesn't want to be your boyfriend. Get over it and find a new hobby, B*tch! FREEBYRONCASE.COM

I have been away for ages, I cant believe this is still going. free Byron Case.

what kind of DIRT is he hiding.

THE TRUTH IS STILL THE TRUTH
NOTHING HAS CHANGED

BYRON IS INNOCENT.

Haha... You have to love all the pathetic responses to this article. If you people really knew Byron you would know that he is VERY capable of murder. If Justin were here today I am sure that it would be his testimony you're slandering and not Kelly Moffett's. Its just sad to see how many people he has under is little intellegent mind fucks. Keep it in your trendy Westport coffee houses and out of the surviving families' lives. You people honestly make me laugh. Oh, and by the way, Kelly Moffett never took the reward money.. odd considering she was a crackhead (that could have bought a lot of crack). But life goes on. Oh, wait, no, not for Anastasia or Justin... hmmm... Smell ya' later!

No, Aaron, I don't know what you're saying, or at least what you think everyone will understand. Of course, most of us live in the real world.

I get a notification from a search engine every time a site with Anastasia's name updates. I've tried to ignore this one for a long time, but it's been more than a year now, and you have no more of a life than to spew on blog sites like this. It would be comically pathetic if it weren’t so sad. And I'd be more inclined to ignore it if you hadn't gone too far on "Thoughts.com", and revealed that you were still stalking Kelly Moffett.

You ramble and bluster all over the place, but never make a truly rational argument. I'm more convinced of Case's guilt by the Manson Family-like reactions from his supporters than I was after watching his trial.

Just WHY do you find it "difficult to believe" that the defense didn't call those people for their "testimonies"? FYI, the prosecution DID call Diane Marshall as a witness, and the defense cross-examined her. You'd know that if you hadn't gotten yourself ejected from the courtroom. What exactly did you think she would testify to? She testified about giving Anastasia a ride to the cemetery, and about how unusual that was, as Justin had always before come and picked her up at her house.

And no, no one except you seems to know or care why the defense would have called the victim's family to the stand when they could give no pertinent testimony. Maybe they could have called you up to the stand as well and asked about your criminal past, just to show what kind of pervs and criminal types Case associated with.

The prosecution didn't get to ask Case about his heavy cocaine use. Why? It wasn't pertinent. What pertinent information do you think the defense could bring up calling the victim's family to the stand? Betsey Owens’ police statement, the one that she never expected anyone would see? I kind of wish they had brought the lying bitch up. She'd have had to admit then and there that her statement was false, and you'd have nothing to masturbate to now.

And to repeat what I put up in the blog that your group took down, apparently embarrassed because they'd already revealed they'd been stalking Kelly Moffett, and I showed that you were still obsessed with Kelly and with Anastasia's family, sending out an email to your buddies with Rock's and Moffett's home and work addresses. You already admitted to wanting to stalk Kelly Moffett in 2002, talking about "digging up dirt" on her even then.

Why do you send out emails with addresses of people you hate, Aaron? There must be a reason, and I doubt it was to add them to Christmas card lists. I think you were hoping someone would harass them. You have a better (and rational) explanation? Didn’t think so. Loser.

What convicted Case was when the jury heard his admission on that tape. You want us to believe his BS story of Anastasia getting out of the car at that stop light, but his conversation with Moffett put that all to lie. If he'd been telling the truth, the jury would have heard him tell Kelly that she shouldn't make stuff up, that he didn't kill his friend, that he's still bothered by her death. What the jury DID hear was him talk about the police with Kelly, knowing exactly what she was talking about when she told him "We're both fucked". They heard him pointedly change the subject when she asked him why he killed Anastasia, and not because he thought she was crazy, but because he was uncomfortable talking about it. They heard him coach her on how to talk to the police and tell them she "can't remember things." They heard a guilty man who had no remorse for what he'd done.

I notice you never really argue the merits of the case any more. You make shit up, and you cherry pick small items you think will "prove" your assertions, when you either don't know that nearly all of those points were brought up during the trial testimony, or you're hoping that no one else will. You make attacks on people when you know it won't help Case's appeals. You bring up stuff that has already been shot down on appeal.

You hide on the internet and make accusations and claims you can't prove. You said you read "some of the police reports". This is the example of "cherry picking" that has been talked about. SOME police reports. You lie about the whole case: No reward was ever collected, even though you like to still call Moffett's testimony "possibly incentivized" Case was informed exactlyu what he was being arrested for and was read his rights before being taken away, though you write it up as if he was "disapeared" by the Secret Police. You've read SOME of the police reports? I've read ALL the trial testimony, having helped transcribe a large part of it.

It's been said you'd do anything for your friend Byron Case. I'm guessing that probably includes lying and attacking people just to hurt them. If Byron Case really believes that you’re helping him by slandering and stalking people, then he’s less intelligent than he’s usually given credit for.

Everyone knows that you’re incapable of answering this with anything but vitriol and more lies. I’m leaving this message as a permanent record (one that you can’t take down like you did with the “Thoughts” blog) so anyone who does read this can see what you really do to "support" your "friend".

BTW, I did pass on all the information from that "Thoughts.com" blog to Anastasia's family. I haven't talked to them as to whether they plan to pass it on to MODOC, but I'm hoping they do.

Get a life Aaron. Your current one sucks.

And those of you who keep posting just to pick fights with them, please stop doing it. It's no more sporting than teasing a chained up dog. Yes, I believe they're misguided, some of them downright pathetic, and Aaron himself a nutjob, but I don't go looking to start fights, just counter lies. If we leave Aaron alone here to write to his own audience, it will cease to be a dialogue and will become the Byron Case Circle Jerk.

Wow! What a response. Ok I will start from the top....For the readers... I will never hide. I do not need to post anonymously. If my name is not next to my post, then you can rest assured that I did not post it. The deal with Thoughts.com, I had no affiliation with. I never even heard about it, until you mentioned it.

Funny how I post a paragraph and you respond with an essay. I have no life huh? Well I guess besides having a wife, two daughters of my own, one and three years old, a full time job, and going to school full time, I don't have much of a life after all. Thanks for pointing that out to me, friend. Other than that, I am a lonely loser without a life or purpose. :0

Kelly Moffett:

Hummm... Depends what you would consider stalking?

"We've" dug up some interesting "police reports" concerning Robert WitbolsFeugen, and Kelly Moffett. Looks like they have been quite busy in their, "most productive lives". Apparently Kelly, married a forty-five year old man, and had a kid with him. Received a police report concerning Kelly Moffett. Apparently she was arrested for domestic battery in 2004. Gotten divorced, and lost custody of her daughter, and back being a drug addicted, alcoholic whore bag. Robert WitbolsFeugen's police report, I am still waiting on. But from what I gather, it was a disorderly conduct charge, resisting arrest, and assaulting a police officer. Hard to imagine considering his abusive past. I wonder if it's too late to add wife beater, child molester, and murderer to his current charges. Humm.....

My Points.

#1 Was Byron Case standing over "THE EXACT LOCATION WHERE ANASTASIA'S BODY WAS RECOVERED THE FOLLING DAY? No, it was Robert WitbolsFeugen.

#2 Did Byron Case take out a second life insurance policy on Anastasia one week before her death? No it was her father, Robert WitbolsFeugen.

#3 Did Betsy Owens say to police investigators that if Anastasia had been beaten to death, that she would not have put it past Byron Case to have committed the murder himself? No it was Robert WitbolsFeugen.

#4 Did Byron Case purposely mislead police investigators? No it was Patrick Rock and Robert WitbolsFeugen.

#5 You fucking know it!

#6 I said God damn those hand picked cherries do taste bitter sweet, don't they?

More soon I promise!

I'm coming for your rotten soul.

http://freebyroncase.com/casedocuments.html

Night night. Don't let the bed bugs bite!

By the way you only have to post the same blog once. Idiot!

Your buddy, Aaron Vermeulen

Wasn't Kelly Moffet offered immunity from prosecution herself to testify against Byron?? I don't think they NEED to offer her the reward money when they are telling her to basically say what they want her to say on the stand, in order to convict SOMEONE or she would go to prison herself... that must have been reward enough for her.

The Pitch can't be trusted to get things right. One post they print twice, the next one they lose. I'm going to write another one this time, and try to catch up on the rest if this goes through.

"Beasley", whoever the hell you really are, let's see when a member of your family is brutally murdered, just how you define "obsessive". It's clear you don't have any idea of the difference between maintaining a memorial for a murdered loved one and trying to harm the family of a murder victim. Doofus.

Jamie, you once claimed you were an "expert" on this case, but it's clear that you're only an expert in the Byron Case version of it. Your personal stint in Missouri's penal system seems to have given you the viewpoint that there is no such thing as a fair trial. You make up accusations against police and prosecutors because you believe there are no guilty people in prison. Were YOU innocent? Did you get screwed by a vindictive witness, a corrupt police, a super-ambitious prosecutor, an easily fooled jury, an incompetent defense attorney, and/or a lazy judge? Or did you really do the B&E? Byron Case claims that all those things happened to him; he must be the unluckiest bastard in the world, or this must be one hell of a good fiction.

I know this is a difficult concept for you to deal with, given your perspective, but Moffett was not a jailhouse snitch. She came forward with her story. Had she remained silent, the police could and would have done nothing to her.

Kelly Moffett admitted to a drug counselor that she had witnessed a murder. When the counselor informed her that the police would have to be called, she panicked and blamed Justin Bruton. She had already admitted the truth to her parents (I should point out that she did so months before Byron Case left for St. Louis, and more than a year after they had broken up), but she panicked when she realized that she would also have to admit her own participation in the coverup. She got immunity for possible charges of Obstruction and Accessory, for having lied to and misled police backing up Case's alibi. You seem to think the police could have sent her to prison without her having come forward, but that only works when you deny reality.

Besides, you're now changing the official party line. You've all been crying for years that Moffett was seeking the reward and looking for revenge. Are you now disavowing that story, and going with the "she was forced into it by police threats" argument? I doubt it. Given the pattern of your group, one of you in another six months will start repeating the "reward" story again, as if it's a brand new unanswered question. Aaron has known the truth for almost six years, as well as the truth of the "insurance policy" story. He even apologized once for his "crazy accusations" regarding that story. God alone knows what happened to his brain cells.

Nicole, whoever the hell YOU are, it is YOU who need to do a little more research, and maybe take a course in writing clearly. I've read every pre-trial document released by the Prosecutor's office, and have read the entire trial transcript. You know a friend of Byron Case's, which does NOT make if "obvious" that you know jack, other than what Byron Case's friend has told you to believe.

Here's what Don Rand had to say about the woman he saw (page 993 of testimony):

"I watched her go all the way up to about Erotic City and about there is where I lose sight of people."

Erotic City is less than a block away from where the Amoco was. He didn't see her for long. He DID testify that the car was in the eastbound lane (another thing that Aaron knew years ago), facing the opposite direction that Case claims, and after Rand told the jury that he saw the woman arguing and saw her walking away upset, he had to admit under cross-examination that he had told police two days after the murder that he had NOT seen her arguing, and that he couldn't tell whether or not she was upset.

Rand described the woman as medium height (5'5" or 6"), where Anastasia was noticeably shorter at 5'2", something that would be obvious to him as close as he'd been. He also tried not to acknowledge that he'd had a long conversation with Tara McDowell (another Case witness) a few days after having talked to police, and that they'd talked specifically about what he saw, but McDowell had already been forced to admit it before he testified.

And Aaron still proves my earlier point. He will not answer any of the challenges made, like why he sent out that email with Moffett's and Rock's personal contact in it. We know why he did that: he was hoping someone might decide to harrass them. Come on, Aaron, answer the question: What's YOUR explanation? You all try to ignore the obvious facts of Byron Case's taped admission, and just make up recycled questions to distract yourselves from the fact that your Emperor has no clothes.

How many of you know why Byron Case had his name changed from Brook Case? According to his own former web site, he was sexually molested by a family friend and his parents did NOTHING about it. A few years after that, he was so messed up that they felt he needed a new identity. How fucked up is that, Evelyn?

After Aaron's email got circulated to Anastasia's family, we discussed filing a cease and desist order, and to that end hired a PI to find his address so such an order could be delivered, and there was a real surprise about this guy who claims to live in Shawnee Mission with his wife and two daughters. He's never voted, paid taxes, taken out a library card, enrolled in school, bought or rented a home, or conducted any normal human business from any address other than his parents' home. There is no marriage license or birth certificate with the name of Vermeulen in the last eight years within a six-county area. Either he's going to soon be on the top of Homeland Security's list of potential domestic terrorists, or he's just a pathetic loser who has to make up stories about himself.

Next post, I'll get into the stories that Case told his classmates at Lincoln Academy about his mother and father, which included both parents' sexual practices and his story of being deported from Australia.

In classic Lonely Ol' Pat Rock fashion, you're attempting to elicit information from us by telling boldfaced lies and challenging us to prove you wrong.

It's clear that YOU don't understand the difference between maintaining a memorial for a murdered loved one and deliberately seeking to hurt the family of someone who is incarcerated. You're not hurting Byron with your attacks; he doesn't have internet access in prison, stupid. The only people you're hurting with your slanderous website are the people who care about him, MANY of whom don't engage you folks in the online mudslinging.

But arguing with you is pointless, isn't it? You'll just post another five-hundred-word rant here, reiterating the same attacks, calling the kettle black.

Cheers to you, Mrs. V. I was surprised to hear you and your kids were imaginary. Aaron must be really good with Photoshop. How does he pull off those real life sitings, though? Are you a hologram? Grin.

Internet harassment is now illegal in Missouri.

Ha ha ha. You got me! You got the tater! Listen, anyone that knows me and is my friend, has been over to my residence and has met my family. I feel really bad for the absence of purpose in your life.
I'll dig deep and put together something special for you Mr. Rock.

More soon. Your friend,

Aaron Charles Vermeulen

FYI, Aaron, I don't live in Missouri, and neither do you. If you DID live in Missouri, where you say internet harassment is a crime, then Patrick Rock and Robert WitbolsFeugen would both have already had your wanker ass in jail and facing civil suit by now. You are the one engaging in harassment, not anyone else.

And BTW, slander and libel are crimes in EVERY state. If you were as brave as you claim, you wouldn't hide behind the internet with your false accusations. You'd put it out there with your signature on it and take your chances, but we all know that you're coward.

Your FBC wankfest has been made up almost entirely of cowards who hide behind anonymous sockpuppets. Actually, it's been mostly made up by you.

Your paranoia, thinking I'm Patrick (when he long ago gave up on engaging any of you) is no different than when you were posting behind sockpuppets on Thoughts.com. You've redefined the word "obsession" again to exclude your apparent need to stalk two middle-aged men and one 20-something woman.

Isn't it ironic that when one a member of the FBC Circle Jerk attacks the family of a murder victim while hiding behind a sockpuppet, you think it's amusing and for a good cause, but when someone from the victim's family, giving their name, does much less to you in response, you want to whine and call it harassment? Go find a lawyer, at least one who could use a laugh. And speaking of internet harassment . . .

Say, Aaron, does THIS look familiar to you?

From
http://wm39.inbox.com/data.aspxx?_cu=uHf7_6XQJx5hjJWTCIVR7t0mcGfXiTAVBRs0jMrOOhDIqezxOw7ep0N2KuxKR0tfZVZkz3uk4GcO-7P8qCIia-tcEr4sY6rw@

Received: from muleman@kc.rr.com by (206.165.97.86:25) 

Received: from barthalamule (CPE-72-128-44-102.kc.res.rr.com [72.128.44.102])

	by ms-smtp-02.rdc-kc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l8E35dLS027739;

	Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:05:40 -0500 (CDT)

Message-ID: 

From: "Aaron Vermeulen" 

To: "Labyrinth Thirteen" 

Cc: "Anna Hunsicker2" ,

        "Byron Case" , ,

        , ,

        

Subject:  FBC Surprise for Patrick Rock! :0

Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:13:35 -0500

X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138

X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138

X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine

X-Spam-Ratio: 7.07

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0046_01C7F653.5451BD70"

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Greetings! 

This is Aaron Vermeulen,

I've been cleaning out my external hardrive and have a real treat for you .....motherfuckers...  

Sorry, I love to cuss. 

Those that know me best, know that I'm straight up ruthless! Except no imitations! 

Hey when in Rome right? Cheers!  :0

Content-Type: image/gif; name="contact-info Pat Rock Kelly Moffett.gif"

So the question remains, Aaron, WHY DID YOU SEND THIS OUT? What reason, other than wanting to incite harassment against these individuals, did you have?

You can deny it if you wish, but we both know it was from you, and we'll both know you're a liar. You won't admit to having done it because you can offer no rational reason for it.

And for someone as busy as you claim to be, you've been posting a buttload of sockppupets today and yesterday. You have a lot of imaginary friends, and even have to get your imaginary wife to defend you. Do you let "her" kiss your "kids" goodnight with that mouth of "hers"? Addressing "her" words to YOU, "You need a hobby and you chose ranting in a free magazine's plog to fulfill that."

You still haven't addressed any of the points I made about your (deliberately) faulty memory, so I'm going to assume you will admit by your silence that you withdraw your claim about Robert WitbolsFeugen's insurance policies. Even though you admitted six years ago that you understood that WitbolsFeugen had taken the policy out on his ENTIRE family, you left the insurance policies up on the site. The reason? Because you always intended to make the same claims again, hoping it would be forgotten.

This is no different than the denials and avoidance that you and others did on Thoughts.com. You all kept changing the subject, attacking me, doing everything EXCEPT address the issues. Why? Because you have no answer for them. Byron Case made a tacit admission of guilt on tape before his arrest, he told an investigator a year after the murder he "had better things to do" than talk to him, he made threats to sue Anastasia's family without grounds (hoping to bluff them), restisted arrest, and gave three variations of his alibi. When no one could answer those questions, you took down the entire blog to avoid letting others read the inconvenient questions that FBC couldn't answer. The difference here is that you can't take the comments down here. Anyone outside your own Wankfest will be able to read just how guilty Case is, and how you just can't explain the holes in his defense. They'll see what a complete loser you are, and how truly guilty Byron Case is.

I think I'll suggest to the family that they point MODOC to THIS blog, ESPECIALLY since you can't take back any of your statements, with the point that most of this is coming from that "social" group you guys have. Do you think any of your internet buddies on FBC will still talk to you when the MySpace group gets kicked off again, just because you can't keep it in your pants?

Thanks again for using a sockpuppet, Aaron, and showing anyone who sees it your cowardice. You just can't defend yourself, so you create new diversions to further cloud the issue.

And you have NEVER addressed the issues I raised as to Byron Case's guilt, so we have to assume you're accepting them. You've been caught on several incorrect statements and outright lies. You won't address them. You just keep attacking me, hoping no one will remember that Byron Case is really guilty, that the proof is out there, and that you can't rebut it.

And Aaron/John, YOU are the ones with the guerilla tactics. Don Buchwalter is NOT a member of our "camp", just a defector from yours. Other than apologizing to the family for his earlier actions, he has had no contact with us. The truth is, you've all been hiding for a long time before Mr. Buchwalter defected, and a long time before I started calling you on your lies.

Serving legal papers is "stalking"??? Well, welcome to AaronWorld, everyone. A PI took all of 5 minutes to run your name through a police search (she got more information off his criminal record than anywhere else), and it took that much time just to confirm that you hadn't been missed somewhere when he only showed up at his parent's house. But when you've made up such a fake life for yourself, have a real possibility of being directly responsible for your friends' little "social" group being taken down, AND you've spent so much time denying reality, yeah, I guess you can redefine a well-understood legal principal to say that you DON'T stalk but that everyone who doesn't like you DOES stalk.

Stalk you? Don't need to. I live more than a state apart from you, and you still live with your parents. And about a year ago, the FBC web site USED to ask for money, for legal advice, AND . . . wait for it . . . A PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR!! For what purpose was YOUR side wanting a P.I.? Don't worry, we ALL know, though I'll bet you weren't worried about already being stalked by someone like Aaron.

You're all hypocrites. You were going to use a P.I. for the same reason you do anything, to hurt people. You're not trying to uncover evidence that will exonerate Case, you just want to harm others.

Just remember, YOU started it. I have copies of all of those crazy emails you wrote to Patrick, making wild accusations, apologizing and then having a nutty again within the same message. We have a history of all the threats you've made, and a list of the people you've stated you hate. We have the complete canon of wild ramblings that Evelyn Case used to anonymously vandalize our guest book. We know it was her who anonymously called police to make accusations against Patrick.

Man, if we ever stooped to YOUR level of attacks, you'd REALLY be crying.

When you can explain rationally why you sent out the email with Patrick's address, only THEN will you be able to discuss "stalking" without everyone laughing at you. Glass houses, asshole. You're nothing but a hypocrite. All you're able to do now is hide behind sockpuppets and accuse me of being a big meanie. I have shown you that we have the proof of your incitement to harass, and you just keep changing the subject when we all know you're lying. As your friend Byron about how well that kind of tactic worked for him.

Ooh, you got me. Wait, no, you missed again.

"obsessed crazy man"

Okay, but why are you describing Aaron? He's the one obsessing on Patrick Rock, Robert WitbolsFeugen, and Kelly Moffett, and has been doing so for over six years now. Aaron is the crazy one who makes up stories about his own life.

"spewing venom and personally attacking anyone and everyone that you can"

That's Aaron again, who has actually used the word "hate" to describe his feelings toward those people, and to myself as well. I've only gone after two people, both of whom have constantly soiled themselves with hateful attacks against Anastasia's family, and my "venom" against Aaron has been to bust him on his lies. My "venom" against Evelyn Case (who has never had the courage to put her name to a single slander of hers) has only been to repeat stories that her son told about her. Either Evelyn's a slut and a truly bad parent, or Byron was lying through his teeth. Which is it?

"honor Anastasia? By focusing on your hate?"

Is THIS how you defend Byron Case, by slanderously attacking others? You're all hypocrites.

Anastasia's 29th birthday should have been yesterday, and not a single one of you has the moral right to speak of "honoring" Anastasia.

As for "hate", see the above. You guys already tried this kind of crap on Thoughts.com, trying to claim that Anastasia wouldn't want me to do this. Well, my response, to quote "Mrs. Vermeulen" (I honestly thought that was referring to Aaron's mother when I first saw it), Fuck off. None of you knew her, none of you know what would be in her heart, none of you have even read the letter she wrote two days before her murder that said specifically "Byron can go fuck himself for all I care". As is stated on our website,
she still speaks for us all.

The hatred that has spewed from the FBC group has gone unabated for six years, and this whining that it does now is just proof that they can dish it out, but they can't take it. I have a lot more things I can say about both Aaron and Evelyn, but I made the point so that they know what the golden rule is. THEY'VE been doing to others (and have been lying while at it), so they shouldn't feel so surprised that others might do to them. The other point I made is the one that you're all still afraid to address.

ONE MORE TIME: All you can do is attack, and there's no one listening except yourselves. What you fail to do is honestly defend against the charges raised.

Case made a tacit confession that helped convict him.

Don Rand saw nothing that helped Byron Case's alibi.

When Aaron casts suspicion on Robert WitbolsFeugen, he is just making shit up, deliberately misinterpreting information to assert his "theory", and is using arguments he plainly knows to be false.

Every time you try to change the subject, you are in effect admitting you can't answer the charges, and that the charges are true.

BTW, Aaron, WHY did you send out that email with Rock's and Moffett's personal contact information on it? I say it was an attempt at harassment. What's your excuse? What's that? Silence? "We shouldn't talk about this"? That's a familiar response.

I don't hate any of you, not even Aaron, who's too pathetic to hate. I do, however think that you are all fools and/or liars.

Aaron, I'm all for "tactful" and "compassionate" if you're game to try it. However, I really DO expect a rational explanation for your having sent out that email last year. Since you refrained from name-calling in your last post, I will also.

We already have the letter you quoted from Byron Case. You sent it to Patrick in 2002, among the emails you sent out. It quotes the police report that you already mentioned in your other post. Again, on the day that report was made, it was absolutely obvious where Anastasia's body had fallen (I've seen photos that Robert shot of the area from that day), though perhaps not the exact angle, and her father was in an understandably agitated state. It should also be noted that the officer who made that report (Epperson) later testified for the prosecution in Case's trial. The only cross-examination he got was whether or not he could tell if the act "was committed by a stranger or an acquaintance of the victim". He had an opportunity to ask about Robert WitbolsFeugen and did not.

And before you fall back on the tired old "incompetent lawyer" argument, it should be noted that Byron Case has already run that appeal through the courts and didn't blame his attorney for that "mistake". You have to expect that he had a hand in his own defense strategy, since he had him offer evidence of the distance from the Amoco to Inland Drive, when that never came up in court otherwise. In addition, Case already lost his appeal on "Ineffective Counsel", an appellate court having ruled against him in February and the Missouri Supreme Court refused to consider it in May, so his arguments about an "incompetent lawyer" are over and done with as far as appeals go. If you're trying to free your guy from prison, arguing issues that the court has already ruled upon (and which cannot be used any further as a basis for appeal) is a waste of time.

You seem to be depending a lot on the idea that if there's not a document declaring Robert WitbolsFeugen innocent, he must still be under suspicion. In debate, that is called an "argument from ignorance" (argumentum ad ignorantiam): if you cannot prove me wrong, then I must be right, regardless of whether I have any evidence myself.

It doesn't work that way. Cops don't make reports saying "I have checked this suspect out and he/she is clean". As many times as Robert WitbolsFeugen requested interviews with Sgt. Kilgore, and as hostile as they had been toward each other, if he had been considered even the slightest bit suspect, Kilgore would have run him down with a tank and grilled him at least one time when he had the opportunity. He didn't do so.

You keep wanting to cast aspersions, but you could call Sgt. Kilgore at the Sheriff's Department today and ask him whether or not he suspected Robert. You don't do that. It seems you'd rather keep false suspicion alive than have it confirmed or refuted. You're more interested in the issue than its resolution.

As for the insurance policy, Case wrote his letter to you BEFORE you wrote your letter to Patrick apologizing for having put up such "crazy questions". I am assuming that this issue is closed for good now, and that you understand that Robert took policies out on his entire family, NOT just Anastasia.

And I asked earlier for you to show DELIBERATE intent to mislead on Robert's part, as opposed to a distraught father battling with a frustratingly slow police investigation, and I've seen nothing there.

I've answered your latest issues, and I'm still waiting for you to respond to the issue of the tacit admission, with something other than what the jury already heard and rejected.

Do your own research!

We did, and I do not consider a letter from the convicted killer trying to cast aspersions and suspicion upon others in the case for which he was convicted to be much research in itself.

Take your time if you wish, I'm busy with other stuff for the weekend and the next day or two afterward.

Jamie,

FJK... FKJ??

It's the latter. Frank K. Jung. BTW, Jung was Anastasia's maternal grandfather's name as well. We're all distantly related to the psychiatrist Carl Jung.

Anyway, Yes... I was snitched on by a guy.

I did not mention your criminal past to embarrass you, so the confession was not really necessary. I apologize if it came over that way. Besides, I already knew your record. I brought it up because Byron Case wants us all to believe that he is a victim of (1) a vindictive and pathological liar of an eyewitness, (2) corrupt police, (3) a ruthlessly ambitious prosecutor, (4) an easily misled jury, (5) an incompetent defense attorney, and (6) a lazy and indifferent judge, and I asked you (in so many words) as someone with that kind of experience, whether you honestly believe from all your experiences that every single one of those misfortunes happened to him, as it requires all six for him to be as lily-white innocent as you believe and still be convicted, according to his official story.

I doubt you have the depth of character to hack it in a place like that though

You're probably right, I lack so much "depth of character" that I've never gotten in trouble with the law outside of a traffic ticket. At the same age where you were doing all your self-described "dumb stuff", and Byron Case was doing cocaine and playing video games with friends, I was working my way through college, earning a Bachelors and Masters . . . sorry that I'm so comparatively shallow. I now work in a private criminalistics lab. And just as you do, I work hard and I earned everything I own. And having seen so many lives destroyed or damaged by crime, I have an acute appreciation for life, just as you do, if for different reasons.

Now, if we're finished trading insults, let's actually discuss the case.

well, I did get to read a lot you know, the state is required to furnish any and all evidence . . . A lot of discussions.

In the course of this forum you stated that I seem to remember reading in the transcript (for one source) about how the forensic investigator (who was an intern filling in while the "main man" was away on vacation) (June 4, 2007), when the "main man" (Jackson County Medical Examiner) DID perform the autopsy, while the DEPUTY Jackson County Medical Examiner testified when he was unavailable, and contrary to your belief from your reading, no "intern" was involved. For all that reading and discussion, your interpretations are selective, almost as if you read and interpreted things through the filter of Byron Case. I don't think you're now capable of removing the filter to view the evidence without the bias of your friendship.

One of your last comment involved your personal (and IMO baseless) speculation that Kelly Moffett could have been threatened by prosecutors to get her to testify, which is a change from the original party line of "she did it for the money" or "she did it for revenge". This is the second reason I mentioned your time in the pen; my job sometimes requires working closely with ex-cons, and while I have no problem with guys (and women) who have served their time, owned up to their mistakes, and are now on the straight and narrow, I have noted that many if not most of them casually accept the concept that ANY con who makes such a claim is to automatically be believed. But stories like that involve snitches with prior records trying to avoid hard time. Kelly Moffett had no prior record, and had been the one to approach the Prosecutor's office. And besides, you've deviating from Official Party Line. Most ex-cons who have done hard time also claim to have a sixth sense for telling whether someone is lying or not, yet in practice have no such ability. They make mistakes and trust the wrong people as much as anyone without prison time, if not more.

but I can say I was never in fear of Byron Case at any moment, ever. He's not a murderer... doesn't have it in him.

And I'm sure that it's possible he doesn't "have it in him". . . at least not now. I'm sure he didn't have it in him byt the time he was arrested in 2001, having gotten his desire to kill out in 1997. You didn't meet Case until he had a reason to appear benign and harmless, when he needed help from all. You make a poor character reference, if only because you never saw the arrogance and general manipulativeness of the cocaine-using high school dropout when he hung around Kansas City's coffeehouses. The third reason I brought up your background is that I have never met a single person who admitted to a crime who believed they would or could get caught for their crime at the time they committed it. This goes from shoplifting all the way up to murder. Byron Case, whether or not he ever admits to the murder, did not believe he'd be caught for it. That's why he was so uncomfortable talking directly about the murder to Kelly Moffett on that tape, yet had no problem a minute later advising her to tell police that she "couldn't remember" if they asked her any hard questions. "Doesn't have it in him"? Well, you weren't crowding out his time with his best friend (a best friend who occasionally bought him drugs and gave him a place to crash) as Anastasia did, you didn't see through and challenge his bullshit the way Anastasia did, and he was living in a tightly controlled and monitored world with consequences for his actions when you knew him, something that was not true when he killed Anastasia. There are at least two Byron Cases here (probably more): the one who lived off of friends and family, told lies about himself and his family, and thought himself immune to the consequences of his actions, and the one who got caught. That second one still tells lies, but he's more careful about them.

And this note to all: I really am not attmpting to change your mind. If you believe this, you believe it, and no amount of counter argument will sway you. But if you all plan to go on a public board like this and repeat false and/or unverifiable claims, I will challenge them. If you keep bringing up arguments that you wouldn't dare use in court for lack of evidence (or for the equally important reason that the court has already considered the argument and disagreed), I will challenge that. If you try to answer reasonable arguments with personal attacks, remember that it is a double-edged sword, and you may cut yourselves if you draw it again.

I'm still waiting for Aaron to return and "explain" the email he passed around to members of FBC with Rock's and Moffett's personal contact information, to explain how it was anything but an incitement to harass them, and exactly how he thought such an action would help Byron Case's claims of innocence. I'm also waiting for him to explain his "98% true" claim that he made at that time.

I'm also still waiting for the FBC site to explain how Byron Case could have been arrested and not told why without a Miranda objection being raised at his trial. I'm waiting for them to explain exactly which "prosecution witnesses" Kelly Moffett's testimony was at odds with, and exactly which of the "very laws of physics" did her testimony defy. I'm still waiting for them to prove that Don Rand saw anything that "vouched for Byron case's innocence" without having to stretch the laws of physics themselves.

You can make all the unverifiable and false claims you want on behalf of Byron Case, but they ARE lies, and you all know it. And if you know they're lies, then you know he's guilty.

"Nicole", if you're going to be a sockpuppet for Aaron, at least you could try to sound different than him. Instead of addressing the issues, you simply attack those who disagree with your view of reality. Are you all sure you're not the Bush Administration?

The Don Rand "third party" is an example of cherry picking, as it's obvious from both his statements to police and his cross-examination that he did not see anyone arguing or looking upset, and it's also obvious that he saw an eastbound vehicle on the south side of the road and not a westbound one on the north side. By carefully avoiding that, and going only with his discredited direct testimony (the stuff that he had to admit on cross was false), you cherry-picked that information.

By ignoring Byron Case's tacit admission, you cling to the claim that Kelly Moffett's testimony was the only thing used to convict Case. That is cherry-picking.

You keep claiming that Kelly Moffett was an "embittered ex-girlfriend" who would put herself through the hell of testifying in a murder trial just as "revenge" for Case breaking up with her, yet ignore the fact that Moffett broke up with Case (not the other way around), and that it was nearly two years before she talked to prosecutors. By carefully misstating the facts, you make it sound like it all happened in a period of weeks. Cherry picking.

By ignoring Byron Case's August 1998 phone conversation with the detective, the one in which he refused to come in for an interview and said he "had better things to do", you claim that Case had no idea he was a suspect and that he cooperated with police.

Even though you already knew the facts of Robert WitbolsFeugen's life insurance policies (took them out on his entire family, and only when a salesman called), you still present it like important evidence. The only evidence it presents is to show just how far you will go to misinterpret facts to your own advantage. Cherry picking.

By putting on the FBC website an absolutely false statement about Case's arrest, you make it sound like he was "disappeared" by the Secret Police, that he was "dragged from his bed" and that his pleas of "why?" were met with silence. The fact was (according to official reports that he did not challenge in court) that Police came to his house wearing uniforms that could not be mistaken. Case saw them, turned, ran, and tried to barricade himself in his bedroom. He was subdued, handcuffed, informed that he was under arrest for the murder of Anastasia WitbolsFeugen, and read his rights. Your story is not even cherry picking, it's just making shit up.

And "Nicole", just in case you're not Aaron and are just another pathetic sycophant of Case's, my advice is to look in a mirror before you throw stones. I don't expect you to "beleive" my "story", as (A) mine is not the "story" here; I'm just rebutting the falsehoods put out by Aaron and the FBC circle jerk, and (B) you are nothing but a True Believer, and you will believe black is white no matter what proof otherwise is shown you. I wouldn't try to make you believe anything else any more than I'd try to convert a Jehovah's Witness. Just isn't worth expending the breath.

And I'm comfortable with my life and my career, and I don't hide my name, unlike those of you who have to hide your identities behind aliases and sockpuppets. I'm just not comfortable with ignorant people insulting Anastasia's memory by telling so many lies to make her killer seem "innocent". This blog's original writer was correct: Byron Case is a sociopath.

I'm not trying to convince YOU, I'm putting this out to protect any innocent bystanders who might stumble across this and actually believe the paranoiac rants of a convicted murderer's fan club if there was no rebuttal.

Aaron and Evelyn made a point of slandering people with false information, so I responded with facts about them and about their boy, facts that they are not comfortable with. They put up claims about the murder and investigation, I put up facts to rebut those claims.

Got anything constructive to add to the debate? Something other than mindless attacks? No? Then you're just wasting bandwidth, which is what you seem to do best.

Jamie, I thought I'd give it a day to see if you or anyone else from FBC wanted to distance yourself from "Uncle" here, but it's apparent that you do not or cannot. I'm guessing this clown thought it would be hilarious to turn your regular "ring and run" game into something even more juvenile, insulting the memory of a murder victim and anyone associated with her. He/she must have expected to enrage me, but has failed in that attempt. "uncle" only serves to confirm what I've said all along about the majority of this group: they are pathetic.

The fact that no one on your side has ever repudiated such actions just paints you with the same brush that "uncle" uses. It's infantile, and it does nothing to help the object of your concern.

I will not try to match "uncle"'s attempts at bad poetry, but instead inject a taste of reality: Byron Case has already failed in his first two appeals, and they were his big guns. He might be able to concoct another one or two appeals, but they will be increasingly desperate and will be proportionately bigger failures. Byron Case will spend the rest of his life in prison, and he will die within those walls. If any of you believed differently, you wouldn't waste your time on activities like "uncle" has. The fact that any of you resort to such childish behavior shows how hopeless your cause is.

And he deserves to be there. You keep harping on what they didn't produce at his trial, but won't own up to what they DID produce: in effect, he confessed to the murder in his conversation with Kelly Moffett by his specific refusal to talk about it.

Jamie, while I disagree with your perspective, I respect your right to have it. However, if you cast your lot with creeps like "Uncle" here (and you are known by the company you keep), then I have no respect for you at all.

First, please understand that you are no "friend" of mine, and that I seek no peace or solace from any of you. As I said in my last post (and as you apparently failed to understand then), I'm not trying to convince any of you; I'm posting rebuttals so that any person who stumbles on this site and sees all the lies written in the name of B. Case can see the other side as well. You don't like me here because you don't like to see any evidence that refutes your claims.

When you have lost a loved one to a violent crime, then and ONLY then are you qualified to give such advice as you so condescendingly offer to me.

Hey, let's try this:

Byron Case is in prison for life without any chance of parole. He will never get out. He will die behind those walls. Get over it. Take a deep breath and let it go. There is more to life than obsessing on some jailbird who's been there for seven years now and will be till he dies. There's more to life than spewing hatred towards the family of his victim and towards the witness who turned in the killer. Just let it go.

Now, read that last paragraph again a few times. Didn't that feel condescending to you? It's exactly how anything you say comes out to me. You want to argue that Case is alive and Anastasia is not? He killed her, so yes we still have a bit of a grudge about that. You want to argue that Case is innocent? No he is not. He has not proven that to any appeals court, and your "evidence" has not moved that debate any further.

I hate to have to repeat this point again, but apparently you all are slow learners.

I came on to this blog because I was sick and tired of Aaron Vermeulen sending out his threats that he was going to produce some "real dirt" on people, accusing Anastasia's family of things he could not prove, and laughing like a nasty little boy. When he sent out an email to his friends on FBC with Patrick Rock's and Kelly Moffett's personal contact info with an implied invitation to all to harass them, I've called him on that a number of times and he has never yet had the guts to explain it, or even apologize for it. In his last post here, he said he'd explain his letter, but that was in mid-July. He's been in hiding since.

We are fully aware that the anonymous attacks against Patrick and against Anastasia's father are "courtesy" of Evelyn Case, who continues to stalk Robert WitbolsFeugen to this day. Several months ago, she called Robert's house to ask his wife if they were divorcing. She was apparently disappointed at the negative reply, but it didn't stop her from ranting for over 20 minutes about her darling boy. They recorded part of the conversation and reported it to the Victim's Liaison with the Jackson County Prosecutor's Office. She tried to call the police anonymously and accuse Patrick of molestation. We all know it was you, Evelyn, and you're more likely a molester than Patrick. You let your son be molested and never dealt with it.

I don't monitor this blog, but my search engine keeps pulling it up whenever someone posts some new, obsessive comment. The search engine just reports when any site containing Anastasia's name gets updated, and there are over 200 comments on this blog, the vast majority of them vicious attacks from you people.

I do not obsess about Anastasia. I help Patrick maintain her memorial in order to keep alive the memory of a good person who died long before her time. What's your excuse? You believe Case is innocent? Then prove it, dammit. Show me proof consistent with the facts already known. Show me that Justin Bruton killed Anastasia in a scenario that matches evidence. Aaron claims Robert WitbolsFeugen did it, but cannot present a scenario in which he COULD have done so.

Case has already been convicted and has lost two (actually three) appeals, and his web site has never bothered to tell you that bad news (hard to raise funds when there's no appeal; guess he's just using the money for cigarettes and pay per view now). This case is past the time of trying to reintroduce old issues that were taken care and disposed of in pre-trial, trial, or appeal. If you have nothing new, then you have nothing at all.

And so, "A Friend", I don't hate anyone on here, I just don't respect anyone here. I disrespect Aaron because he's spread so many lies and exaggerations, and seems to enjoy the masturbatory schadenfreude he gets from attacking others in his obscene game of ring and run. I disrespect Evelyn Case because of all her anonymous spamming of our memorial site's guest book, the fact that she cannot admit the shitty job she did creating that monster. I have no respect for the rest of you because you're all so willing to accept and believe Case's lies, so much that you completely ignore any evidence that disagrees with those lies.

If you'd like me to "let go", here's the way: take your whiny complaints about what a raw deal Byron Case got onto your Facebook site, or just put new posts in the FBC guestbook, or JUST TAKE IT SOMEWHERE ELSE PRIVATE. If you want to make public comments on a space like this, where everyone has the opportunity to reply, I promise I will reply. Otherwise, fuck off.

I agree. All Frank Jung does is come on here and tell people who don't agree with him to fuck off. Some spokesperson for the memory of a murder victim! He reminds me of John Mark Byers (the stepfather of victim Christopher Byers in the West Memphis Three case).

Frank Jung, I don't support Byron Case. But I do think that you do your cause a severe and major disservice by posting such personal attacks against people on this message board. You come off as exactly what I suspect you are: a man who is simply full of hate and using this as an outlet for that hate. Let go, dude or in the alternative, at least shut the fuck up for awhile.

I am not Aaron Vermeulen. I am just a reader of this blog who is interested in both sides of the story. So far, neither side has convinced me of anything outside of the fact that BOTH sides hate each other. Since you are the most vocal on here, I singled you out for being the most obvious hater.

"A Wanker" has stated that he is not Aaron Vermeulen, but he still uses the same tactics, calling me "full of hate" and telling me to "let it go", without making any effort to tell anyone else the same, and doing so behind an alias. If this were truly a disinterested third party, he'd have no fear of putting his name on his posts, as I have. Instead, he uses a sockpuppet, and his first post was an attack. What were the odds?

People on my side, who have taken little or no part in this discussion, have been attacked and libeled as pedophiles and killers; I've just reported the true facts about two of the main attackers. Since "A Wanker" has now decided to answer my questions, it is painfully obvious who he was all along. Nice try, Aaron. Actually that's not true; pathetic try, Aaron.

(1) Why has Byron Case consistently tried to hide the fact that he knew all along that he was a suspect?
The "reply":

You can't be a suspect without any evidence against you. If the police believed Byron Case was a suspect, why couldn't they have made an arrest before Kelly Moffett came forward?

Case was a suspect all along because he was one of the last three people to have been seen with Anastasia, and his alibi was suspicious. The police already knew that Anastasia had neither struggled with nor run from an assailant, and his alibi would have required such actions. If you disagree, please come up with a believable scenario which does not violate the known forensic evidence.

That, plus Case admitted to Anastasia's family in an email that he knew he was a suspect, and he admitted during his own testimony in court that he knew he was a suspect. For reference please go here (http://www.stasia.org/case_against/correspondence_19980502_bcc2pfr.html) and here (http://www.stasia.org/case_against/transcript_case_b.html#suspect).

However, "suspect" and "defendant" are not the same thing, and a prosecution required more evidence to present to a jury. That evidence came from Kelly Moffett's eyewitness statement, and from Case's own tacit confession.

As far as why did police not arrest him, that answer was contained in the Appellate Court rejection of his first appeal. Case argued that police should not have gotten the taped conversation between him and Moffett, as they had probable cause to arrest him when Moffett came forward. The Court's reply was that "Case might be right that the police had probable cause to arrest him in September 2000. But, there 'is no constitutional right to be arrested,' and the police 'are under no constitutional duty to call a halt to a criminal investigation the moment they have the minimum evidence to establish probable cause.'

(2) Why did Case refuse to come in to speak to police when asked in 1998, telling them that he had "more important things to do"?
The "reply":

He had already told them everything he knew by 1998.

And that was HIS call to make? The police asked him to come in multiple times, and he refused. Either he was the most arrogant asshole to ever be innocent, or he was avoiding having to answer the same questions again and risk tripping up.

(3) Why did Case resist arrest? And why does his web site lie about his arrest?
The "reply":

Had he actually resisted arrested, he would have been charged with that as well.

Police testimony during the trial was that he resisted arrest. There is no grey area here. This attempt at rewriting history is again pathetic. Yeah, they had him for Murder One and Armed Criminal Action; why not slap a 30-day sentence for Resisting as well? Yeah, right.

He closed his bedroom door because he was frightened.

The description on the web site is a plain lie, probably told by Case himself. You know he was not "dragged from his bed" because he ran from the living room into his bedroom and was busy trying to push his door closed when they subdued him. He was informed as soon as he was handcuffed on what charges he was being arrested, and he was informed of his Miranda rights. He asked no questions of the officers; one of the officers said he bawled like a baby while being taken away.

Robert WitbolsFeugen might know something about resisting arrest, though.

But you know all about that Aaron. I've seen a few of your rants on politics, some of which are well thought out. You hate the Republicans, but you use their tactics here, always trying to misdirect. Why is that?

(4) Why, when directly asked why he killed Anastasia, did Case change the subject instead of responding with a denial? Why, after changing the subject, did he continue to advise Kelly Moffett to deal with police by saying "I don't remember"?
And an honest reply:

The telephone recording isn't something I am prepared to defend at this point.

Waiting for your buddy Byron to give you his "explanation"? Well, he didn't come up with one at trial, for all the months of preparation he had.

What you have never understood (or at least have never admitted to) is that it was never and issue of what the Prosecution didn't have against him ("No DNA!" "No weapon!" "No motive that we believe!"), but what it DID have against him, and his own words were among the most damning evidence they had.

She asked him, "[W]hy, seriously, why did you have to kill her?" He gave her silence.

She asked again, "[E]xplain to me as to why you actually felt the need to kill her," and he gave her silence again.

When she said, "I mean, was there, seriously, any reason to all of this?", his reply was "We shouldn't talk about this."

A moment later, he told her that he had "immunity" (a concept he was quite mistaken about), and then told her "I told my lawyer flat out that I didn’t -- I wasn’t going to remember things. Told the cops that, too. I was, like, 'I can’t remember things'," and then advised her to do the same whenever she spoke to them.

These were the words the jury heard, and these words more than anything else convicted him. He had numerous opportunities to protest, to tell her she was crazy for accusing him, and it was already known during his trial that he knew at the time that he was a suspect (why else would they have called Kelly in for questioning as often as they did?), and the rationalizations just do not work.

(5) Why would Anastasia, two nights before her murder, send a letter to Justin Bruton with the specific phrase that "Byron can go fuck himself"?
The "reply":

I'll answer your question with a question: If they weren't good friends, why did Anastasia send an email to Byron a month prior to her murder pleading with him for advice, saying he was the only person she could talk to?

And you still did not answer my question. Why did Anastasia write her letter only two nights before her murder, making no effort to keep it from Case's eyes, if they were such "good friends"? You can read the letter in its entirety here: "http://www.stasia.org/case_against/letterfromAnastasia.html".

(6) Why did Byron Case complain that, because of Anastasia, he was able to spend less time with Justin?

Provide documentation of this.

(7) Why did Case, only weeks before the murder, leave such a vicious message on his pager, a message that even one of his defense witnesses admitted was out of line?

Because Anastasia was obsessed with Justin Bruton and paged Byron Case often attempting to track Justin down. That would irritate just about anyone.

(8) Why did Aaron Vermeulen send out an unsolicited email to members of the FBC group with personal contact information other than for the sole purpose of attempting to instigate harassment against them and/or their families?
The "reply":

8) You already know the answer to that one.

Some more:

(9) Aaron, why did you consider those times of consuming quantities of cocaine with Byron and then playing video games to be the "good old days"? Evelyn Case (on this forum, 6/14/07) blamed his cocaine use on having been "turned on to it" by someone. Was it you? Or did he get you interested in it?

(10) Evelyn also (in that same post) still insists that her son's felony conviction for stealing was reduced to a misdemeanor. This is untrue; he was identified during his trial (years after that conviction) as a prior felony offender, while he was in the courtroom, and he made no effort to argue the point. Did he forget? Is Evelyn just hallucinating? Or did Byron Case just lie to his friends and family, telling them he'd gotten it reduced?

Frank Jung, you say "A Friend" should have no fear of putting his name on his posts, as you have."

I think that the fact that you are extremely angry is quite obvious to anyone who reads your daily rantings and ravings on here. (I can imagine spittle flying off your lips if you were speaking).

So that you would think it odd that someone would not want to post using their real name is completely laughable!

I mean, come on, would you want someone as angry and obsessed as you are to know who you are and where you live? No thanks. I'm not ready to give some obsessed mad man any excuse to come after me.

And you scare me, dude. Get help before you end up in prison for something violent that you do.

Wow. Frank needs to get a life.

Not a Friend: Frank has a life. It involves posting her daily about how much he hates certain people. So there, chew on that!

Frank, can you also set your search engine to notify you every time that I scratch my balls? Seriously, you don't think that you are angry and obsessed? You should see yourself the way outsiders see you. And you have ZERO proof that I am this Aaron character outside of your own narrow-minded insistance that I am.

I am not Aaron and I do not support either side of this argument. I am just a guy who stumbled onto this page, started reading, and was amazed by how angry this Frank character is! I mean seriously, it is just simply incredible.

Niether side of this argument does anything to further their cause, I can tell you that!

And "Frank" is the worst of the lot.

God, sometimes I hate it when I'm right. Yep, Aaron is back, and all he could do was play with himself in front of us all. He has nothing substantive to offer.

This is the best you can do?

"A Friend" proved he was Aaron when, after claiming not to be a supporter of Byron Case, he started (badly) defending Case in one of his "replies" (9/15), and made the confimation absolute by taking a shot at Robert WitbolsFeugen, something that is 100% Aaron and nothing but Aaron. It helps the identification that "A Friend" throws exactly the same kind of temper tantrum that Aaron does in his named posts. All that plus the fact that "A Friend" has frequently posted here from the same IP address that "Aaron Vermeulen" uses. God, you're stupid, Aaron. Don't you think some of these things can be traced?

You're doing this because you can't come back as Aaron. "Aaron" dropped out rather unceremoniously back in July after having been stuck for an answer about his attempts at internet harassment. You'd think that being outed for lies about your personal life would be enough, but it took having to own up to possibly felonious acts that scared off his only true ID. But you just can't stay away, can you Aaron?

Bottom line is that Byron Case really did murder Anastasia WitbolsFeugen and is rightfully doing a life sentence in a max security prison for his crime.

Bottom line is that he will be there FOR THE REST OF HIS MISERABLE LIFE.

Bottom line is that the evidence supports his conviction.

Bottom line is that Aaron is a pathetic wanker who has no real life, and that his attempts at using sockpuppets and not get caught has degenerated into an ugly clusterfuck.

Bottom line is that Aaron CANNOT make a legitimate, rational, and believable answer ANY of the questions I've posted.

Update for ya, Aaron, since you're so obsessed with Robert WitbolsFeugen: I heard from one of his daughters this week, and learned Jackson County has decided to postpone his "trial" till after the election, and word is that they will not pick it up any time soon, having such a weak-ass case against him. Sorry to disappoint you. Wait, no, I'm actually laughing at your disappointment.

Get help soon, Aaron, before you hurt someone.

You know, I miss arguing with Jamie. His arguments were only marginally better than yours (I'd hope he's still a bit embarrassed about his "depth of character" remark), but he at least didn't start his arguments from some fantasy world. He just believed that "prosecutors are trained to be sociopaths" and that a public defender draws "his paycheck from the same source as the prosecutor does" (an attitude and belief that are drawn from his own past), but he had less of the stink of True Believer than you do.

I note that, possibly in response to my statements here, the FBC website has now announced that the MySpace circle jerk has been closed by its administrator, so as to work on "other promotional endeavors". Nice save effort, Sylvia. If you really want to get anywhere, you should remove all the taint that the association with Aaron still leaves on the site. But of course, there wouldn't be much left afterward.

For the record, I just want everyone to know that I really don't think that Byron Case is guilty and that I now believe that he should be released from prison.

Also, I would like to publically apologize to anyone who has read my words on here whom I may have offended. Thank you.

Frank asked: "So tell us, "A Friend", just how did you manage to stumble onto this? What were you searching for to land here?"

I was searching for your mailing address. I wanted to send you the phone number for a good therapist who can help you deal with your hate issues.

I was also searching for a way to understand why people like you are so filled with hate. I'd ask you, but all you would do is accuse me of being some guy named Aaron, the second greatest object of your hate outside of Byron Case.

Who else is on your hate list?

Dude how long has it been since my last post? Seriously? Wow! You are truly a work of art. I started a post and have since put it on the back burner from months ago. I will put it all together over the next couple of weeks. Please feel free to rant daily until then! :0 By the way how is Robert WitbolsFeugen's police charges coming along? Isn't he due back at court on FRIDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2008 at Location:DIVISION 28 Jackson - Independence 9:00am. Tell him I send my blessing. Karma follows us all, no mater who we are, or how powerful and exalted we have become. :)
AV out!

Byron needs a new trial. Being convicted solely on the testimony of a drunken crack head is just plain wrong, and scary, too.

We should all be scared to death if that is what it takes to send someone to prison for the rest of their life.

Sorry I've been gone for so long, as we have an election recount going on up here. I knew there were comments (search engine still works), but I've had some higher priorities.

I expected I'd find a couple more goofy comments from another Aaron sockpuppet or three. Imagine my surprise to find only one Aaron sockpuppet, and one in support.

Guys, is it one of you from work? If so, no fair, I can do this myself, though I will say your comments were on the mark.

If it's not a coworker of mine, it's definitely not family, as we almost never refer to Case as "Byron", but by his last name; he's done nothing to earn the respect of being called anything else. Perhaps I should just refer to him as "Inmate 328416". No, I won't, but I don't call him by his first name. I call my friends by their first names, and he is definitely not that.

One correction:

"regardless if he was suffering from a high fever from strep throat"

Case was suffering from a low-grade fever (101 F), not a "high fever", as he claimed. His doctor's evaluation shows that, and you can tell from the tape of his conversation with Kelly Moffett that he was not delerious and had not just woken up. He was sick, no doubt, but delerious? Just another lie/exaggeration by B.C. Case.

As for Vermeulen's (yeah, I'll stop calling HIM by his first name as well; from now on, he's the Wanker) "gothical" post, it's the same old argument, misstatement, and slander as before. Kelly Moffett was neither drunk nor a crack head on the night she witnessed Anastasia's murder; she was neither drunk nor a crack head when she testified in court about that night. And Case was not convicted "solely" on that basis. There was the matter of a bad and unbelievable alibi, and oh yeah, that tacit confession.

You always seem to forget that, don't you, Wanker? Case in effect confessed to the crime, and his alibi violated all logic. Next thing, you'll be going back to Don Rand. How'd that work out for you last time?

Frank
when EXACTLY did you meet this leader in person?

I came upon this rather bizzare site during a web search for items pertaining to my now deceased daughter. It is, to an outsider, a rather strange and sad place to visit. Way too much arguing, accusations and, quite frankly, silliness about something that has been decided a decade ago and, if revisited, will be decided by a court of law and not arguments on a blog.
BTW, I am not really interested in the case and have no opinions as to it's eventual outcome.