The Kansas City Group Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Whitlock vs. Playboy: The Star Columnist Comes Out Swinging, and the Magazine Responds

Fri May 02, 2008 at 03:48:48 PM

By ERIC BARTON

It seemed strange this morning to read Jason Whitlock complain in this column about how the editors of Playboy screwed up a story he'd written for the magazine by writing a headline that he didn't like. The Kansas City Star's sports columnist claimed that the headline — “Jason Whitlock, The Black KKK” — didn't reflect the freelance story he'd written for Playboy.

What seemed odd was to be reading his complaint in the Star. Why would the paper's editors allow one of their writers to use his column to complain about the editing of a piece he wrote on the side? It's like complaining to your boss at your day job about that prick you work for at night.

I left voice mails for the Star's Holly Lawton, sports editor, and Mike Fannin, managing editor for sports and features. I didn't immediately hear back, but if I do, I'll post the response here.

Napolitano  

I also called the public relations department at Playboy, and they sent my request to Playboy Editorial Director Chris Napolitano, the person Whitlock blames in his column for the bad headline. Napolitano just sent me this e-mail response, which claims Whitlock had known about the title for months and didn't complain about it until after it had gone to press.
"Playboy has an impeccable history in dealing with civil rights issues. We didn't have any ulterior motives when deciding on a headline for Mr. Whitlock's excellent story. Even though we used the working title 'The Black KKK' in our assignment letter to Whitlock on February 7, I was not made aware of his displeasure until a month after we had gone to press. (For the record, Whitlock misquotes the subhead to the story. It actually reads, 'Thug life is killing black America. It's time to do something about it.') From the beginning, our idea was not to stir divisiveness but to stir debate. I still believe the title, presentation and planned publicity campaign are appropriate and accurately reflect the points in the article expressed in its introductory paragraph and throughout. I feel that most people who read his brilliant cultural commentary will regard it as a powerful indictment of the root causes of violence and despair devastating our cities and suburbs."

After getting the e-mail, I called Whitlock for a response to the statement. Whitlock says he returned my call because nobody else had gotten a response from Playboy, and he wanted to hear what editors there said. Whitlock says the assignment letter in question got to him after he had filed his piece, and he says he didn't know how the magazine was going to be promoting his article until April 23, when he received a pitch letter being sent to media outlets. "That's when I was like, 'Holy shit,'" he says.

As for the claim that he knew about the headline for a month before the article went to press, Whitlock says: "They're so full of shit."

After our short conversation, Whitlock added: "I realize I'm talking to The Pitch, so I know my words are going to get twisted. You have enough?"

Yes, I believe I do.

Category: Media, Sports

8 Comments:

jim says:

It's clear the Star has no control over Jason Whitlock's entirely huge head. Good job on calling him out!

Notafan says:

What you have to realize is Whitlock doesn't write about anything but himself. He forgot at some point in time that he is in fact a sports writer.

kcfella says:

Fatlock has outgrown our small town. What is he doing writing for Playboy in the first place? To Denver with you, Jason!

Why does everyone pick on Whitlock? Other than Kansas State, Kansas, Wichita State, Missouri, the KC Chiefs, Royals, T-Bones, numerous little league teams, your mother, Jesus Christ, Girl Scouts, old people, dogs, Jews, whites, hispanics, Koreans, Muslims, volunteers, the Red Cross, school, health food grocery stores, and women who has he EVER written a derogatory piece about!?

PTBitte says:

Whitlock actually writes some columns that may make readers THINK.

Unlike a certain Reverend who has been featured a lot in the press lately, Whitlock holds that the choices made by a number of people within the black community have a significant effont on the overall condition of the black community.

When drugs and crime are considered "respectable" by enough members (not all, not even a majority, but enough) of a community, that community is going to have a very difficult time improving itself. This is especially true if that community wants to blame others for their choices and is willing to wait for those others to fix that community's problems.

Whitlock's article turns a spotlight on some of those choices, however the Playboy title has noting to do with describing the contents of the article (but the subtitle does).

wumble says:

Thank God his dispute isn't with Playgirl.

Over photos.

Quit hatin' says:

Whatever. Whitlock tells white people what they want to hear about "thug life" but are afraid to say. He validates their fears. It's an act.

wumble says:

Quit hatin'-- I'm confused. Doesn't Whitlock's thug life stance make HIM the hater? Are you hating the haters for hating the hater?

Post a comment

Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.




The Pitch Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff