The Kansas City Group Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Piss-You-Off Summer Reading

Wed Jul 16, 2008 at 03:20:16 PM

By C.J. JANOVY

At the downtown library, I recently checked out Aram Roston’s new The Man Who Pushed America to War: The Extraordinary Life, Adventures, and Obsessions of Ahmad Chalabi. I had hoped to learn more about Chalabi’s relationship with Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback.

Chalabi is the Iraqi exile and charming con man who fabricated the Iraqi National Congress – an impressive-sounding organization supposedly made up of leaders-in-waiting of a new, free Iraq once the U.S. toppled Saddam Hussein. As Roston shows, though, the INC was really just a handful of Chalabi’s sometimes drunken sycophants. Still, Chalabi was able to convince key Washington insiders – mainly Neocons with big names such as Richard Perle – that we must remove Hussein. These folks pushed Chalabi’s fairy tales long after the CIA quit buying anything he had to say (and I mean literally “buying”: U.S. taxpayers funded Chalabi’s escapades in the Middle East and in London for years).

As Roston puts it, Chalabi didn’t have his own army to depose Saddam, so he talked us into using ours. Much of this talk consisted of long-since disproven “facts” about WMD programs, mobile chemical weapons labs and lots of other propaganda that many of us average citizens knew was bullshit way before the war ever started.

As we reported back in 2004, Brownback was one of Chalabi’s main escorts around the halls of power in Washington. Disappointingly, Roston devotes a mere sentence to the senator from Kansas, and it doesn’t tell us anything we didn’t already know. That’s not to say Brownback’s role in Chalabi’s game has been overstated; it’s simply because Roston focuses on other aspects of Chalabi’s life.

One subplot that’s particularly disturbing is how Chalabi played the media. That includes the New York Times’ Judith Miller, whose sins against the profession by now are well known. It also includes David Rose, who wrote several pro-Chalabi stories for Vanity Fair before realizing he’d been duped. The account of Rose’s reporting – and gradual realization that he’s been had – is agonizing for a journalist to read. In Roston’s book, Rose regrets how his reporting helped rush us to war; he’s shaken and humiliated. I know what it feels like to regret something I’ve written, but jeez, how could he have gotten it so, so wrong?

Roston’s book is as important as it is painful. He conservatively estimates that over the course of eleven years, we – you and me, U.S. taxpayers, through the CIA and other agencies – paid Chalabi and his delusional cohorts $59 million for their bogus intelligence and twisted PR.

That doesn’t include the cost of the actual war.

We haven’t heard much from Brownback since he aborted his pathetic run for president. Actually, we didn’t hear much from him even when he was running. Here's hoping he’s fading, because Kansans can do better.

Category: Janovy, Politics

2 Comments:

(the) Trevor says:

It MUST be important if you are willing to check it out of the library. Plus, as we all know, whatever is written HAS to be true.

Alas, I am in too good a mood because of the work of most of your writers today to debunk this flimsy, but inviting morsel. Maybe I can pencil it in for tomorrow?

I am (the) Trevor and I approved this comment.

(the) Trevor says:

The second Iraq war is the silver bullet able to slay the neo-Repub monster and provide the Democrats with the power, right? Bullshit. There is no silver bullet any more than there is, or would have been, no new taxes, a lock box, international tests, an accomplished mission, or any other in the myriad of politicized terminology offered without logic as a silver bullet. Let’s examine two of these mass regurgitated silver bullets; WMDs and the Chalabi conspiracy theory.

If you concoct only a single reasonable argument for every 100 times you toss out "no WMDs" or a half baked conspiracy theory, you would be too busy making sense to waste time replicating the mass regurgitating in one of your crowded abortion clinic waiting rooms that is battling morning sickness. Mass regurgitation of illogical arguments is not “reasonable”. If every time someone puked forth “Bush’s War” or “WMD” they were required to reasonably defend their argument or pay a dime to the IRS, our government’s coffers would be so full that taxes could be abolished.

The no WMD argument is one of the most abused mass regurgitated silver bullets. The photos and accounts of Sadam using WMDs on the Kurds is indisputable proof that Sadam did have WMDs. Sadam’s games with Hans Blix and UN Security Council Resolution 1441 (and all the previous Resolutions it summarized) were understandable reasons to quit sitting on the pot and put some bite into the bark. So, quit using the WMD as your “Get out of Jail Free” card because no rational thinking person can buy it. But, the irrational ones are going Linda Blair with that shit and it is beyond annoying.

The exposé conspiracy book is another tired concept that cannot ruin my summer because I like to laugh, and laughable is what the book is. Realize that, unlike what you are taught in Media 101, most people are capable of thinking at greater than the 5th grade level. So, give them that opportunity. Most people will buy into the Occam’s razor philosophy to make their decisions. So, for rational people, it is a simpler explanation that the truth is yet to be delineated rather than buying into a conspiracy theory based on a single Iraqi Chalabi-like figure being able to razzle-dazzle thousands of decision makers and United States citizens with smoke and mirrors. They treat such rot with less regard than the National Enquirer or the Kansas City Star because, unlike the events leading up to the second Iraq war, the book offers no reasonable cause for action.

Some points that I cannot argue include that journalists are easily duped, that the United States paid big money to bad people (including Sadam and Bin Laden), that the neo-Repubs use the same silver bullet tactics, or that Kansas can do better than Brownback. Most importantly, I cannot effectively argue that Iraq was or is being handled in the best manner possible. But, I can argue that the WMD argument is irrational. I can also argue that the contributions of Chalabi, the media, and anyone else without a vote on the Iraq War Resolution had fuck all responsibility on the matter.

Post a comment

Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.




The Pitch Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff