The Kansas City Blog



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Music Uploads

Concert Review: Tom Waits at the Fox Theatre, 06/26/08

Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 11:04:55 AM

By ROY KASTEN

The glitter fell but doom never did. So much the better for this -- how else can it be put? -- historic Tom Waits show at the Fox Theatre. Not that Waits didn’t try to summon all the spirits in the boneyard at the end of the junkyard at the end of the world. The hall roared when he gave “What’s He Building In There?” all his crypto-voyeurism, but his greatness has nothing to do with channeling Vincent Price. And who cares who “Mr. Stitches” is anyway? One can only take so much persona.

Click the photo to view slideshow.

Photos from the show.

For all the prophecies of chaos and clusterfucks that heralded the anti-scalper gouge-fest that is the Tom Waits ticketing system, the Fox staff moved the sell-out crowd through the block-long lines on Grand like they knew what they were doing. To think I could I have driven to Memphis, chased some trucker speed with a half pint of bourbon, and made it back to St. Louis, stopping for all the coffee and cigarettes I could consume at every other truck stop along the way, for the same price as my VIP2 Row H ticket. I might have gotten some stories out of it, but none of them would have been history.

More after the jump.


So if it’s true that Waits last played St. Louis 30 years ago (there’s apparently a photo of a young Tom on the walls of B B’s Jazz Blues and Soups; was it there that he played?), then the question of why he waited so long to return answers itself. One concert every five, even every ten is an event. Once in a third century changes everything, and your grand kids will want to hear all about it.

What you should tell them, first off, is that from a purely aesthetic vantage, Waits is much better on record -- or at least on the great records of the Island and Anti- years. It’s not a fair comparison, but that doesn’t mean it’s not inevitable. The performative power, the stage-as-the-world, is already there on the records. They are self-contained planets of sound, ideas, rhythms, beautiful and demanding black holes that take hold of everything and make everything vanish.

You should also tell them to have that extra cocktail and cigarette because Tom might just start an hour late. But at 9:00 pm the house lights went down on the pawnshop basement stage – dominated by an iconic air horn and megaphone totem tree – and the band began grinding out “Lucinda,” the first of many obscurities from the great Orphans collection. With the opening lines, “They call me William the Pleaser / I sold opium, fireworks and lead / Now I’m telling my troubles to strangers / When the shadows get long I’ll be dead,” Waits established the ground rules: At this show, he would tell his stories, how and when he’d choose. You’ll get your “Johnsburg, IL” –- played at mid-set with all the fragility of his world –- but you’ll have to get through him first.

Closing in on 60, Waits is his voice, and his voice is a force. It’s one thing to bellow like Satan’s blues brother on a song or two. It’s another thing to do it for nearly two hours straight, no intermission. Without that voice, he’d be on the street, holding a sign and selling pencils from a cup. Or nearly, because there’s the rest of his genius, evident in every preacher, teacher, two-screw-missing drunk gesture, the way he grips the microphone stand like he wants to strangle it, in his get-up — bowler hat, faux shark skin suit – and in the band, moving in the shadows behind him, that he only seems to let do its own thing.

But he directs the players with the stomp of his boot, kicking up clouds of powder from his barker’s platform and dinging a bell on and off time, or a calming gesture of an open hand. They’re on lock from start to finish. His son Casey gets the time-warped signatures and lurching drive, even on a traditional kit, and keyboardist Patrick Warren and long-time bassist Larry Taylor play like jazz men who refuse to play jazz, like rockers who refuse to play rock. Vincent Henry switches between harmonica, guitar and at least three saxophones, sometimes playing two at once, honking like he’s reading invisible soul charts, then just letting the free jazz peal. Omar Torrez, the newest member of the band, seems to have learned every guitar part from every record, and then said quietly to himself, “Fuck you, Ribot, Verlaine and especially G.E. Smith. Here’s how it really goes.” And his acoustic guitar work on “All the World Is Green,” as the red velvet backdrop changed to blue, was its own chromatic world of wonders.

The set charged on through “Down In the Hole,” “Falling Down” (sung like Otis Redding at the crossroads), “Black Market Baby” (with ska echoes), “Heigh Ho!,” “Get Behind the Mule” (the first song Waits played on electric guitar) and what’s now a centrifugal number for Waits: “The Day After Tomorrow.” Lightly plucked on acoustic, with Taylor’s bass carrying the melody behind him, the performance was more pained, more angry than on record. But those emotions are just trace elements. Waits isn’t really an emotional performer, which is not to say he’s stiff or vacant or cold (that would be absurd). But no song (or very very few) are meant to convey emotion, his or anyone else’s.

And no one believes he has lived the stories -- that’s not the point. The point is really that old Brechtian one he knows so well: It’s the theatrical alienation effect from start to finish. We don’t feel for Waits or his world. But we are immersed in it and we wonder at the pure force of will and at the spectacle of it. But for a moment, a song like “The Day After Tomorrow” dismantles the spectacle and leaves just the brute facts.

After a scatter shot “Cemetery Polka,” Waits turned to the piano, with hilarious monologues about eBay, sperm counts and things you can get arrested for in Oklahoma (including having the wrong hair cut or shooting the tie off a cop), and sang “Hang Down Your Head,” “Johnsburg” and the gorgeous “Lost In the Harbor.” He took the dusty pulpit again for “Make It Rain,” (with a shower of glitter sent down on the singer), a clattering rockabilly take on “Lie to Me,” “Singapore” (reworked in almost straight 4/4 time), “Dirt In the Ground,” “What’s He Building In There” (which should have been lit up by a light bulb lowered from the ceiling; Waits broke it with a few too many taps), “Sixteen Shells From a Thirty-Ought Six” and a clap-along “Rain Dogs” to close out the set.

There was just one encore: “Goin’ Out West,” “Anywhere I Lay My Head” and “Innocent When You Dream.” At the piano, the master of will, mood, lo-fi theatre, lyrical archetypes and impossibly true American stories asked the audience to sing along. Everyone submitted because everyone knows a once-in-a-life-time chance when they see and hear one.

7 Comments:

Anonymous says:

that wasn't larry Taylor on bass....
note the guy was a foot taller had no beard or glasses and is 30 years younger!

Darren says:

I agree with everything said about Waits and the band.
But I just have to mention what to me was a major negative... the sound sucked!!!
You could not hear any midrange. It was all treble and bass and Tom just got lost in the middle.
I'm sure he isn't the easiest guy to mix, but for 102 bucks a seat, I should be able to at least hear the main attraction. Charge me 40 bucks and I wouldn't be bitching right now. Even when the band was silent, I and everyone around me were straining to hear him talk. I've been dying to see the man for 20 years now and was a little let down because of the sound.
Oh and while I'm being a Crabby Craig... the hooting and howling in between about every verse, as if it were the Eagles "7 bridges road" got a little old too.

mac lethal says:

I LOVE Tom Waits. I've been listening to him since I was a little kid, especially because my father has always been such a huge fan of his.

This was the first time I got to see him, and I gotta say it was a disappointment. I waited for the show for 2 months after getting the $115 tickets for me and my friends.

The band seemed to be perfectly on point. Tom seemed to be in absolute top form. His stage aesthetics were marvelous. The dangling light bulb, the platform that splattered powder everywhere with every foot stomp, and the giant bullhorns in the back of the stage were all brilliant touches.

But as Darren said-- the sound was AWFUL. I tour for a living, I play a lot of dive bar sized clubs, and have played so many poor sounding venues that I've probably forgotten half of them. However, I cannot recall being at a show that sounded this bad.

I could not understand a single thing he said. The droning bass just swallowed everything, and it wasn't even loud.

You would think that Tom Waits would have brought an amazing engineer to work the sound. You would also think that a 5,500 person venue that's as beautiful as the Fox Theatre would have an impeccable sound system. Nope. This was one of the worst sounding concerts I have ever attended, and the worst part about it was you could tell Tom was absolutely murdering it. Flawlessly.

Heart breaking.

Anonymous says:

So, i was 3rd balcony row U (about as far back as it gets) and though i couldn't see tom all that well, i myself thought the acoustics were quite impressive. I've been to a lot of venues, and though i've been to a lot that were better, i've been to far more that were worse. but like i said, i was far in the back and was, perhaps, mearly in a lucky spot to hear the show well

Harper says:

Pardon my late arrival to the discussion; I was in a canoe.

First off, jesus, I'm so sorry you had such a letdown, Mac. I was sitting dead middle, 30 rows back, and I could hear every word and guitar note. There was a bass? And the drums -- I thought they must've mic'd it for some kind of "live"-r sound with the mics up high because they were like minimally audible. You were way over in house left, a dozen or so rows back, right? One would definitely think that an ancient venue built before PAs were invented would have better acoustics -- or that the place wouldn't have been so easily misused by the soundmen.

I wanted him to talk more. That brief impromptu monologue about stuff that's illegal in Oklahoma was hilarious. I hoped for way more banter from the Tom; I could probably listen to him chatter on all day about insects and nutmeg and whatever. No big deal.

Man, Roy, you're right on when you talk about theatrical alienation and say "We don’t feel for Waits or his world. But we are immersed in it and we wonder at the pure force of will and at the spectacle of it." But there are moments when Tom's actual self creeps through. I would say songs like "Hang Down Your Head" and "Pony" (which he didn't play -- it just came to mind as an example) are emotionally rich but not personal. On his most poignant songs, and there are lots of them, it's like he's channeling some old 19th century church hymnist plus a 20th century blues howler plus a Tin Pan balladeer plus Gershwin and throwing together this simple but solid and new, universal voice. That is Waits at his best. We saw a modicum of that at this show, and overall it was a good show, but Roy's probably right when he says that Tom is better on record.

My main complaint: He and the band didn't seem that committed to killing it. They could've killed it, but instead they just played it. Along with many of the other burners (or rather, groovers), that includes the encore choice of "Goin' Out West." I don't think they ever bothered with that nasty duhnuhnuhnanana guitar/bass hook that kicks the song into badass mode. It was more like a shuffle the whole time. A shuffle. Tom Waits doesn't shuffle. He howls and moves and sways.

But maybe I wasn't in the Fox's sweet spot, which was probably somewhere down in one of Tom Waits' boots.

Harper says:

Oh, yeah, and Darren is right -- what is it with people spending around a hundred bucks a ticket, going to a classy venue like the Fox to see, presumably, one of their heroes, and fucking yelling like it's a high school pep rally? When they plunk down the money for the tickets, do they think, "I'm spending a lot of money on this show, but I can always add to the personal value by hooting like monkey at the performer." Do they think the artist they've come to see enjoys hearing song names blurted at them from these people's gaping beer holes? These are questions I'll ask the next passing retarded ape person carrying an iPod and eating a record.

Anonymous says:

Great review, nice job. We'll be seeing Tom in the other Fox, in Atlanta. Cannot wait.

Post a comment

Comments may not show up immediately after submission. Please wait a minute after posting a comment for it to appear.




The Pitch Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff